Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32598507›Full record

ArticleJournal of traumatic stress2020

Commentary on the Special Issue on Moral Injury: Leveraging Existing Constructs to Test the Heuristic Model of Moral Injury.

Alyson K Zalta, Philip Held

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of traumatic stress, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alyson K ZaltaDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5159-8431
Philip HeldDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Institutional Career Development Core (Chapter 1)KL2TR002387 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ERIC C BEYER, Lisa L Barnes · 2017 to 2026
$7.6M
Using CBT to Probe Psychobiobehavioral Resilience to Post-trauma PsychopathologyK23MH103394 · NIMH · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZALTA, ALYSON KAY · 2014 to 2018
$769k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002387NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH103394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The literature on moral injury (MI) is currently undermined by the lack of clear boundaries regarding the construct and a dearth of research on the processes by which potentially morally injurious events lead to MI. The heuristic continuum model of moral stressors proposes ways of distinguishing between moral frustrations, moral distress, and MI. In this commentary, we highlight five testable principles that can be derived from the heuristic model and evaluated using well-established constructs. Specifically, we describe meaningful distinctions between guilt and shame and address how these moral emotions can be used to distinguish between moral distress and MI. We also describe the potential role of event-related rumination, shame proneness, and cognitive flexibility in the development of MI following exposure to potentially morally injurious events. We believe that these principles offer critical next steps for the advancement of the MI field and illustrate how MI research can be generalized beyond the military context.

Indexed as

GuiltHeuristicsHumansMoralsRumination, CognitiveShameStress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

Identifiers

PMID32598507
PMCPMC7719065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.