ArticlePloS one2020
Trends and predictors of changes in modern contraceptive use among women aged 15-49 years in Tanzania from 2004-2016: Evidence from Tanzania Demographic and Health Surveys.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of community and provider-driven social accountability interventions on contraceptive uptake in Ghana and Tanzania.International journal for equity in health · 2022Trial
- Article
- Opportunities and challenges in integrating family planning and nutrition services in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- High parity in Somaliland: individual and community-determinants from multilevel analysis of nationwide survey data.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Knowledge and experience of modern contraception use among Maasai communities in Longido district: a qualitative study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Trends and factors associated with condom use among Tanzanian men before and after introduction of pre-exposure prophylaxis: evidence from TDHS 2010-2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Surveys.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Linking women's empowerment to modern contraceptive use: evidence from the Tanzania demographic and health survey 2022.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Trends and factors associated with modern contraceptive use among sexually active female youths in Tanzania, 2004-2022.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Modern contraceptive use in Somalia: a multivariable analysis of prevalence and predictors among women of reproductive age.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Article
- Social context of contraceptive use transition among sexually active women in Zambia (1992-2018): A decomposition analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- A Qualitative Analysis of the Barriers to Healthcare and Education for Adolescent Girls in Tanzania.Cureus · 2024Article
- Trend, geographical distribution, and determinants of modern contraceptive use among married reproductive-age women, based on the 2000, 2005, 2011, and 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Factors contributing to changes in contraceptive use among adolescent girls in Zambia: a decomposition analysis.Journal of public health in Africa · 2023Article
- The impact of community and provider-driven social accountability interventions on contraceptive use: findings from a cohort study of new users in Ghana and Tanzania.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Women's Perception of Using Modern Family Planning Methods in Wete District, Pemba, Tanzania.The East African health research journal · 2023Article
- Utilization of modern temporary contraceptive methods and its predictors among reproductive-aged women in India: insights from NFHS-5 (2019-21).Frontiers in global women's health · 2023Article
- Trends and socio-demographic components of modern contraceptive use among sexually active women in Rwanda: a multivariate decomposition analysis.Reproductive health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionModern contraceptive use provides opportunities for women and couples to achieve optimal child spacing, achieve desired family size and reduce unsafe abortions. Despite these facts, modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR) in Tanzania remains as low as 32%. This study aimed to determine trends and factors associated with changes in modern contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Tanzania from 2004-2016. METHODOLOGY: This was a cross-sectional study utilizing data from Tanzania Demographic and Health Surveys of 2004-2005, 2010 and 2015-2016. Data analysis was performed using Stata version 14. Analysis considered the complex survey design through application of weights, clustering and strata. Multivariable Poisson decomposition analysis was used to assess factors associated with changes in modern contraceptive use. Results were presented in the form of decomposition coefficients and percentages.
resultsModern contraceptive use increased from 23.0% in 2004 to 34.3% in 2016. Differences in women's characteristics contributed 12.5% of the increase in mCPR. These characteristics include partner's education levels, recent sexual activity and being visited by a family planning worker. The difference in coefficients contributed 87.5% increase in mCPR. The most increase in modern contraceptive use was attributed to rural population (44.1%) and women who experienced a termination of pregnancy (7.1%).
conclusionModern contraceptive use has steadily increased in Tanzania. Health policies and interventions need to target sexually active women, rural residents as well as less educated women and men to maintain and further accelerate the trends in mCPR. Interventions focusing on women who experienced a termination of pregnancy may also serve as an entry point to promote use of modern contraceptive methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.