Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32598366›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Pesticide-tolerant bacteria isolated from a biopurification system to remove commonly used pesticides to protect water resources.

Gabriela Briceño, Claudio Lamilla, Bárbara Leiva, Marcela Levio, Pamela Donoso-Piñol, Heidi Schalchli, Felipe Gallardo, María Cristina Diez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Proteome Changes Induced by Iprodione Exposure in the Pesticide-TolerantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biosurfactant Production byMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabriela BriceñoBiotechnological Research Center Applied to the Environment (CIBAMA-BIOREN), University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Claudio LamillaBiotechnological Research Center Applied to the Environment (CIBAMA-BIOREN), University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Bárbara LeivaBiotechnological Research Center Applied to the Environment (CIBAMA-BIOREN), University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Marcela LevioBiotechnological Research Center Applied to the Environment (CIBAMA-BIOREN), University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Pamela Donoso-PiñolBiotechnological Research Center Applied to the Environment (CIBAMA-BIOREN), University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Heidi SchalchliBiotechnological Research Center Applied to the Environment (CIBAMA-BIOREN), University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Felipe GallardoChemical Sciences and Natural Resource Department, University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
María Cristina DiezBiotechnological Research Center Applied to the Environment (CIBAMA-BIOREN), University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-9494-1551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we selected and characterized different pesticide-tolerant bacteria isolated from a biomixture of a biopurification system that had received continuous applications of a pesticides mixture. The amplicon analysis of biomixture reported that the phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria were predominant. Six strains grew in the presence of chlorpyrifos and iprodione. Biochemical characterization showed that all isolates were positive for esterase, acid phosphatase, among others, and they were identified as Pseudomonas, Rhodococcus and Achromobacter based on molecular and proteomic analysis. Bacterial growth decreased as both pesticide concentrations increased from 10 to 100 mg L-1 in liquid culture. The Achromobacter sp. strain C1 showed the best chlorpyrifos removal rate of 0.072-0.147 d-1 a half-life of 4.7-9.7 d and a maximum metabolite concentration of 2.10 mg L-1 at 120 h. On the other hand, Pseudomonas sp. strain C9 showed the highest iprodione removal rate of 0.100-0.193 d-1 a half-life of 4-7 d and maximum metabolite concentration of 0.95 mg L-1 at 48 h. The Achromobacter and Pseudomonas strains showed a good potential as chlorpyrifos and iprodione-degrading bacteria.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalSoil MicrobiologyAchromobacterAminoimidazole CarboxamideChlorpyrifosHydantoinsPesticidesPseudomonasSoil PollutantsWater ResourcesAminoimidazole CarboxamideChlorpyrifosHydantoinsiprodionePesticidesSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID32598366
PMCPMC7324069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.