Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32598321›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2020

The feasibility of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted evacuation of large breast hematomas.

Sa'ed Almasarweh, Mazen Sudah, Sarianna Joukainen, Hidemi Okuma, Ritva Vanninen, Amro Masarwah

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05665894 (Vacuum-Assisted Evacuation), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05665894 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Vacuum-Assisted Evacuation (VAE) Of Symptomatic and/or Voluminous Breast Haematomas Following Surgeries And Percutaneous Procedures: a Retrospective Analysis

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Rome Tor VergataRan2022 to 2022Enrolled15ConditionsBreast Haematoma, Breast Cancer, Breast DiseasesArmsHematoma Vaacum Assisted Biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sa'ed AlmasarwehKuopio University Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio, Finland.
Mazen SudahKuopio University Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio, Finland.
Sarianna JoukainenKuopio University Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery, Division Surgery, Kuopio, Finland.
Hidemi OkumaKuopio University Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio, Finland.
Ritva VanninenKuopio University Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio, Finland.
Amro MasarwahKuopio University Hospital, Diagnostic Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio, Finland.
Kuopio University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Breast hematoma is an often underrated and disregarded post-procedural complication in the literature. Current treatment modalities are comprised of either surgical or expectant therapy, while percutaneous procedures play a smaller role in their treatment. We aimed to examine the efficacy of vacuum-assisted evacuation (VAE) in the treatment of clinically significant large breast hematomas as an alternative to surgery. Patients and methods We retrospectively analysed patients that underwent breast interventions (surgical and percutaneous), who later developed clinically significant large hematomas and underwent a trial of VAE of hematoma in our hospital within the period of four years. Patient and procedure characteristics were acquired before and after VAE. Success of intervention was based on ≥ 50% clearance of hematoma volume and patients' subjective resolution of symptoms. All patients were followed clinically and by ultrasound if needed at different intervals depending on the severity of presenting symptoms. Results Eleven patients were included in the study. The mean largest diameter of hematomas was 7.9 cm and mean surface area was 32.4 cm2. The mean duration of the procedure was 40.5 min. In all patients VAE of hematoma was implemented successfully with no complications. Control visits showed no major residual hematoma or seroma formation. Conclusions Our results show that VAE of hematoma can be implemented as a safe alternative to surgery in large, clinically significant hematomas, regardless of aetiology or duration. The procedure carries less risk, stress and cost with the added benefit of outpatient treatment when compared to surgical treatment.

Indexed as

Ultrasonography, InterventionalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast DiseasesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHematomaHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsbreastbreast hematomahematoma evacuationvacuum assisted breast biopsy

Identifiers

PMID32598321
PMCPMC7409600
OpenAlexW3040542928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.