Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32598315›Full record

ArticleJournal of integrative bioinformatics2020

The first 10 years of the international coordination network for standards in systems and synthetic biology (COMBINE).

Dagmar Waltemath, Martin Golebiewski, Michael L Blinov, Padraig Gleeson, Henning Hermjakob, Michael Hucka, Esther Thea Inau, Sarah M Keating, Matthias König, Olga Krebs and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. FAIRification of computational models in biology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microbiome modeling: a beginner's guide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Beyond the horizon: immersive developments for animal ecology research.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Dagmar WaltemathMedical Informatics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5886-5563
Martin GolebiewskiHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8683-7084
Michael L BlinovUConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9363-9705
Padraig GleesonDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5963-8576
Henning HermjakobEMBL-EBI, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8479-0262
Michael HuckaComputing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9105-5960
Esther Thea InauMedical Informatics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8950-2239
Sarah M KeatingUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3356-3542
Matthias KönigInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1725-179X
Olga KrebsHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-0402
Rahuman S Malik-SheriffEMBL-EBI, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0705-9809
David NickersonAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4667-9779
Ernst OberortnerU.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Joint Genome Institute (JGI), Lawrence Berkeley National Labs, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Herbert M SauroDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3659-6817
Falk SchreiberDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University ofKonstanz, Germany.
Lucian SmithDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-6386
Melanie I StefanCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6086-7357
Ulrike WittigHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9077-5664
Chris J MyersCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8762-8444

Funding

Continued Support of Essential SBML Software and Community ResourcesR01GM070923 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HUCKA, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2018
$8.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a report on outcomes of the 10th Computational Modeling in Biology Network (COMBINE) meeting that was held in Heidelberg, Germany, in July of 2019. The annual event brings together researchers, biocurators and software engineers to present recent results and discuss future work in the area of standards for systems and synthetic biology. The COMBINE initiative coordinates the development of various community standards and formats for computational models in the life sciences. Over the past 10 years, COMBINE has brought together standard communities that have further developed and harmonized their standards for better interoperability of models and data. COMBINE 2019 was co-located with a stakeholder workshop of the European EU-STANDS4PM initiative that aims at harmonized data and model standardization for in silico models in the field of personalized medicine, as well as with the FAIRDOM PALs meeting to discuss findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) data sharing. This report briefly describes the work discussed in invited and contributed talks as well as during breakout sessions. It also highlights recent advancements in data, model, and annotation standardization efforts. Finally, this report concludes with some challenges and opportunities that this community will face during the next 10 years.

Indexed as

Computational BiologySynthetic BiologyGermanyReference StandardsSoftwareCOMBINEcommunity buildingmeeting reportstandardization

Identifiers

PMID32598315
PMCPMC7756615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.