ArticleJAMA network open2020
Use of General Primary Care, Specialized Primary Care, and Other Veterans Affairs Services Among High-Risk Veterans.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Call to Make Equity Actionable in Frontline Practice in Learning Health Systems Using Implementation Science.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- How Primary Care Intensive Management Teams Coordinate Care for High-Risk Patients: A Multisite Evaluation Using the AHRQ Framework.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Changing Patterns of Specialty Care for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Among Rural and Urban Veterans Following the VA MISSION Act.International wound journal · 2026Article
- A Novel Primary Care Planning Informatics Tool Informed by Data-Driven Multimorbidity Grouping: User-Centered Design and Feasibility Testing.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Extreme Heat, Social Factors, and Mortality Among California Veterans With Cardiometabolic Disease.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Expanding Patient-Centered Medical Home Teams in Primary Care: Qualitative Evaluation of Implementation Experiences from a Multi-site Pilot Within the VA Healthcare System.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Are tailored primary care services for social inclusion good value for money? A health economics evaluation with Monte-Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis comparing tailored social inclusion primary care services to mainstream primary care services for socially excluded people.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- The Characteristics of People with Serious Mental Illness Who are at High Risk for Hospitalization or Death.Community mental health journal · 2024Article
- Implementing evidence-based practices to improve primary care for high-risk patients: study protocol for the VA high-RIsk VETerans (RIVET) type III effectiveness-implementation trial.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Primary Care Telehealth Initiation and Engagement Among Veterans at High Risk, 2019-2022.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Meeting high-risk patient pain care needs through intensive primary care: a secondary analysis.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Associations Between Social Risks and Primary Care Utilization Among Medically Complex Veterans.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Unhealthy alcohol use and brief intervention rates among high and low complexity veterans seeking primary care services in the Veterans Health Administration.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2023Article
- Insomnia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and associations with healthcare utilization and costs.Respiratory research · 2023Article
- Article
- My Goals Are Not Their Goals: Barriers and Facilitators to Delivery of Patient-Centered Care for Patients with Multimorbidity.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Trends in Illness Severity, Hospitalization, and Mortality for Community-Onset Pneumonia at 118 US Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Mental Health Reform: Design and Implementation of a System to Optimize Outcomes for Veterans and Their Families.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Association of Integrated Mental Health Services with Physical Health Quality Among VA Primary Care Patients.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Examining telehealth use among primary care patients, providers, and clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC primary care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Integrated health care systems increasingly focus on improving outcomes among patients at high risk for hospitalization. Examining patterns of where patients obtain care could give health care systems insight into how to develop approaches for high-risk patient care; however, such information is rarely described. Objective: To assess use of general and specialized primary care, medical specialty, and mental health services among patients at high risk of hospitalization in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Design, Setting, and Participants: This national, population-based, retrospective cross-sectional study included all veterans enrolled in any type of VHA primary care service as of September 30, 2015. Data analysis was performed from April 1, 2016, to January 1, 2019. Exposures: Risk of hospitalization and assignment to general vs specialized primary care. Main Outcome and Measures: High-risk veterans were defined as those who had the 5% highest risk of near-term hospitalization based on a validated risk prediction model; all others were considered low risk. Health care service use was measured by the number of encounters in general primary care, specialized primary care, medical specialty, mental health, emergency department, and add-on intensive management services (eg, telehealth and palliative care). Results: The study assessed 4 309 192 veterans (mean [SD] age, 62.6 [16.0] years; 93% male). Male veterans (93%; odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.10-1.13), unmarried veterans (63%; OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 2.32-2.35), those older than 45 years (94%; 45-65 years of age: OR, 3.49 [95% CI, 3.44-3.54]; 66-75 years of age: OR, 3.04 [95% CI, 3.00-3.09]; and >75 years of age: OR, 2.42 [95% CI, 2.38-2.46]), black veterans (23%; OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.61-1.64), and those with medical comorbidities (asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 33%; OR, 4.03 [95% CI, 4.00-4.06]; schizophrenia: 4%; OR, 5.14 [95% CI, 5.05-5.22]; depression: 42%; OR, 3.10 [95% CI, 3.08-3.13]; and alcohol abuse: 20%; OR, 4.54 [95% CI, 4.50-4.59]) were more likely to be high risk (n = 351 012). Most (308 433 [88%]) high-risk veterans were assigned to general primary care; the remaining 12% (42 579 of 363 561) were assigned to specialized primary care (eg, women's health and homelessness). High-risk patients assigned to general primary care had more frequent primary care visits (mean [SD], 6.9 [6.5] per year) than those assigned to specialized primary care (mean [SD], 6.3 [7.3] per year; P < .001). They also had more medical specialty care visits (mean [SD], 4.4 [5.9] vs 3.7 [5.4] per year; P < .001) and fewer mental health visits (mean [SD], 9.0 [21.6] vs 11.3 [23.9] per year; P < .001). Use of intensive supplementary outpatient services was low overall. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that, in integrated health care systems, approaches to support high-risk patient care should be embedded within general primary care and mental health care if they are to improve outcomes for high-risk patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.