Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32597950›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2020

Defense Response in Brazilian Honey Bees (Apis mellifera scutellata × spp.) Is Underpinned by Complex Patterns of Admixture.

Brock A Harpur, Samir M Kadri, Ricardo O Orsi, Charles W Whitfield, Amro Zayed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The GenusInsects · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Accurate Detection ofEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical complications in envenoming byFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Admixture in Africanized honey bees (Ecology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Brock A HarpurDepartment of Entomology, Purdue University.
Samir M KadriDepartamento de Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia de Botucatu, Univervidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ricardo O OrsiDepartamento de Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia de Botucatu, Univervidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Charles W WhitfieldDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Amro ZayedDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1957, an invasive and highly defensive honey bee began to spread across Brazil. In the previous year, Brazilian researchers hoped to produce a subtropical-adapted honey bee by crossing local commercial honey bees (of European origin) with a South African honey bee subspecies (Apis mellifera scutellata; an A-lineage honey bee subspecies). The resulting cross-African hybrid honey bees (AHBs)-escaped from their enclosure and spread through the Americas. Today, AHB is the most common honey bee from Northern Argentina to the Southern United States. AHBs are much more likely to sting nest intruders than managed European-derived honey bee colonies. Previous studies have explored how genetic variation contributes to differences in defense response between European-derived honey bee and AHB. Although this work demonstrated very strong genetic effects on defense response, they have yet to pinpoint which genes influence variation in defense response within AHBs, specifically. We quantified defense response for 116 colonies in Brazil and performed pooled sequencing on the most phenotypically divergent samples. We identified 65 loci containing 322 genes that were significantly associated with defense response. Loci were strongly associated with metabolic function, consistent with previous functional genomic analyses of this phenotype. Additionally, defense-associated loci had nonrandom and unexpected patterns of admixture. Defense response was not simply the product of more A-lineage honey bee ancestry as previously assumed, but rather an interaction between A-lineage and European alleles. Our results suggest that a combination of A-lineage and European alleles play roles in defensive behavior in AHBs.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalGenes, InsectGenetic IntrogressionAnimalsBeesMultigene Familyadmixtureancestrybehaviorgenomicshoney bee

Identifiers

PMID32597950
PMCPMC7487160
OpenAlexW3037070176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.