ArticleBioscience reports2020
Identification of feature autophagy-related genes in patients with acute myocardial infarction based on bioinformatics analyses.
Article in Bioscience reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screening and Validation of Key Genes of Autophagy in Acute Myocardial Infarction Based on Bioinformatics.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2024Article
- Identification of Gene Expression Signatures for Phenotype-Specific Drug Targeting of Cardiac Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of autophagy-related key genes in sepsis and potential correlation with immune cell signatures.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Integrated Analysis and Validation of Autophagy-Related Genes and Immune Infiltration in Acute Myocardial Infarction.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Systematic profiling of diagnostic and prognostic value of autophagy-related genes for sarcoma patients.BMC cancer · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify feature autophagy-related genes (ARGs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and further investigate their value in the diagnosis of AMI.
methodsGene microarray expression data of AMI peripheral blood samples were downloaded from the GSE66360 dataset. The data were randomly classified into a discovery cohort (21 AMI patients and 22 healthy controls) and a validation cohort (28 AMI patients and 28 healthy controls). Differentially expressed ARGs between patients with AMI and healthy controls in the discovery cohort were identified using a statistical software package. Feature ARGs were screened based on support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), and an SVM classifier was constructed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to investigate the predictive value of the classifier, which was further verified in an independent external cohort.
resultsA total of seven genes were identified based on SVM-RFE. The SVM classifier had an excellent discrimination ability in both the discovery cohort (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.968) and the validation cohort (AUC = 0.992), which was further confirmed in the GSE48060 dataset (AUC = 0.963). Furthermore, the SVM classifier showed outstanding discrimination between AMI patients with and without recurrent events in the independent external cohort (AUC = 0.992). The identified genes are mainly involved in the cellular response to autophagy, macroautophagy, apoptosis, and the FoxO signaling pathway.
conclusionOur study identified feature ARGs and indicated their potential roles in AMI diagnosis to improve our understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying the occurrence of AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.