Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32597236›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of medicine2020

Effect of vaccination on the use of antimicrobial agents: a systematic literature review.

T Mark Doherty, William P Hausdorff, Karl G Kristinsson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Global Antimicrobial Non-Susceptibility Patterns ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T Mark DohertyGlobal Medical Affairs, GSK, Wavre, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3009-7969
William P HausdorffPATH, Washington, DC, USA.
Karl G KristinssonDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance is a growing global health threat. To preserve the effectiveness of antimicrobials, it is important to reduce demand for antimicrobials.

objectivesThe objective of the study was to screen the existing peer-reviewed literature to identify articles that addressed the potential impact of influenza or

resultsWe identified unique 3638 publications, of which 26 were judged to be of sufficiently high quality to allow the calculation of the potential impact of vaccination. Of these studies 23/26 found a significant reduction in antibiotic use by at least one of the parameters assessed. LIMITATIONS: Different measures used to define anti-microbial use, studies typically focus on specific risk groups and most studies are from high-income countries.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipChildChild, PreschoolDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansInfantInfluenza VaccinesMiddle AgedPneumococcal VaccinesPractice Patterns, Physicians'Young AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsInfluenza VaccinesPneumococcal Vaccinesantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial usemeta-analysisVaccination

Identifiers

PMID32597236
PMCPMC7880080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.