ArticleSurgery today2021
The prognostic relevance of primary tumor sidedness to surgical treatment for recurrent colon cancer.
Article in Surgery today, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of rCCK96-104PE38 Targeted Drug in the General Surgical Treatment of Colon Cancer.BioMed research international · 2022Trial
- Silencing LY6D Expression Inhibits Colon Cancer in Xenograft Mice and Regulates Colon Cancer Stem Cells' Proliferation, Stemness, Invasion, and Apoptosis via the MAPK Pathway.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Detection of methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 after curative-intent treatment as a prognostic indicator for colorectal cancer recurrence.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the predictive relevance of tumor sidedness on surgical resection after recurrence by evaluating the treatment outcomes after primary resection and recurrence in patients with localized colon cancer (CC).
methodsA total of 735 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for Stage I-III CC from 1997 to 2013 were categorized as having either right- or left-sided CC, and survival after primary surgery and after recurrence were analyzed.
resultsA total of 104 patients (14.1%) developed recurrence, 94 of which were in a single organ, and 59 patients underwent curative resection. For recurrence from both sides of the colon, a significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS) was experienced by patients who underwent curative resection compared to those who received palliative treatment (right: 42.2% vs not reached, respectively; P < 0.001; left: 71 vs 15.9%, respectively; P < 0.001). Meanwhile, a still worse OS was observed in patients with curative resection for recurrent right-sided CC compared to those with resection for recurrent left-sided CC (5-year: 42.2 vs 71%; P = 0.03).
conclusionSurgical resection undoubtedly improved survival after recurrence, however, patients with surgical resection for recurrent right-sided CC tended to have a worse prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.