Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32596785›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2020

Producing Standardized Country-Level Immunization Delivery Unit Cost Estimates.

Allison Portnoy, Kelsey Vaughan, Emma Clarke-Deelder, Christian Suharlim, Stephen C Resch, Logan Brenzel, Nicolas A Menzies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Economic burden of measles outbreaks: a cost-of-illness study in a middle-income country in the post-elimination era.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Allison PortnoyHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, 718 Huntington Avenue 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. aportnoy@mail.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8467-1324
Kelsey VaughanThinkwell, Washington, DC, USA.
Emma Clarke-DeelderDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Christian SuharlimHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, 718 Huntington Avenue 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Stephen C ReschHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, 718 Huntington Avenue 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Logan BrenzelBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nicolas A MenziesHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, 718 Huntington Avenue 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1158709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo plan for the financial sustainability of immunization programs and make informed decisions to improve immunization coverage and equity, decision-makers need to know how much these programs cost beyond the cost of the vaccine. Non-vaccine delivery cost estimates can significantly influence the cost-effectiveness estimates used to allocate resources at the country level. However, many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) do not have immunization delivery unit cost estimates available, or have estimates that are uncertain, unreliable, or old. We undertook a Bayesian evidence synthesis to generate country-level estimates of immunization delivery unit costs for LMICs.

methodsFrom a database of empirical immunization costing studies, we extracted estimates of the delivery cost per dose for routine childhood immunization services, excluding vaccine costs. A Bayesian meta-regression model was used to regress delivery cost per dose estimates, stratified by cost category, against a set of predictor variables including country-level [gross domestic product per capita, reported diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis third dose coverage (DTP3), population, and number of doses in the routine vaccination schedule] and study-level (study year, single antigen or programmatic cost per dose, and financial or economic cost) predictors. The fitted prediction model was used to generate standardized estimates of the routine immunization delivery cost per dose for each LMIC for 2009-2018. Alternative regression models were specified in sensitivity analyses.

resultsWe estimated the prediction model using the results from 29 individual studies, covering 24 countries. The predicted economic cost per dose for routine delivery of childhood vaccines (2018 US dollars), not including the price of the vaccine, was $1.87 (95% uncertainty interval $0.64-4.38) across all LMICs. By individual cost category, the programmatic economic cost per dose for routine delivery of childhood vaccines was $0.74 ($0.26-1.70) for labor, $0.26 ($0.08-0.67) for supply chain, $0.22 ($0.06-0.57) for capital, and $0.65 ($0.20-1.66) for other service delivery costs.

conclusionsAccurate immunization delivery costs are necessary for assessing the cost-effectiveness and strategic planning needs of immunization programs. The cost estimates from this analysis provide a broad indication of immunization delivery costs that may be useful when accurate local data are unavailable.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsVaccinesBayes TheoremHumansImmunizationVaccines

Identifiers

PMID32596785
PMCPMC7437655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.