Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32596717›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists2020

Implementation and sustainability of a medication reconciliation toolkit: A mixed methods evaluation.

Deonni P Stolldorf, Amanda S Mixon, Andrew D Auerbach, Amy R Aylor, Hasan Shabbir, Jeff Schnipper, Sunil Kripalani

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deonni P StolldorfVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN.
Amanda S MixonDivision of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Andrew D AuerbachDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Amy R AylorVA Office of Specialty Care Services (SCS), Washington, DC.
Hasan ShabbirEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Jeff SchnipperBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Sunil KripalaniVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Implementing and Sustaining Complex Interdisciplinary Healthcare Interventions: Learning from Medication ReconciliationK01HS025486 · AHRQ · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI STOLLDORF, DEONNI P · 2017 to 2019
$427k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS027369AHRQ HHS R18 HS023757NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMARQUIS (Multi-Center Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study) provided participating hospitals with a toolkit to assist in developing robust medication reconciliation programs. Here we describe hospitals' implementation of the MARQUIS toolkit, barriers and facilitators, and important factors that may enhance the spread and sustainability of the toolkit.

methodsWe used a mixed methods, quantitative-qualitative study design. We invited site leaders of the 5 hospitals that participated in MARQUIS to complete a Web-based survey and phone interview. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided question development. We analyzed the collected data using descriptive statistics (for survey responses) and thematic content analysis (for interview results).

resultsSite leaders from each MARQUIS hospital participated. They reported that MARQUIS toolkit implementation augmented their hospitals' existing but limited medication reconciliation practices. Survey results indicated executive leadership support for toolkit implementation but limited institutional support for hiring staff (reported by 20% of respondents) and/or budgetary support for implementation (reported by 60% of respondents). Most participating hospitals (80%) shifted staff responsibilities to support medication reconciliation. Interview findings showed that inner setting (ie, organizational setting) and process factors (eg, designation of champions) both inhibited and facilitated implementation. Hospitals adopted a variety of toolkit interventions (eg, discharge medication counseling) using a range of implementation strategies, including development of educational tools and tip sheets for staff members and electronic health record templates.

conclusionDespite limited institutional support, hospitals can successfully implement, spread, and sustain the MARQUIS toolkit by shifting staff responsibilities, adding pharmacy staff, and using a variety of strategies to facilitate implementation. Although leadership support and resources for data collection and dissemination facilitated implementation, limited staff buy-in and competing priorities may hinder implementation.

Indexed as

HospitalsQuality ImprovementCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsHumansLeadershipMedication ReconciliationPharmacy Service, HospitalSurveys and Questionnairescare transitionsimplementationmedication reconciliationorganizational contextsustainability

Identifiers

PMID32596717
PMCPMC7455763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.