ReviewInternational journal of bioprinting2019
Revealing emerging science and technology research for dentistry applications of 3D bioprinting.
Review in International journal of bioprinting, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D-Bioprinted Oil-Based Hydrogels: A Sustainable Approach for Bone and Dental Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Unlocking the Future: Bioprinting Salivary Glands-From Possibility to Reality.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Bio-ceramics application in Dentistry.Bioinformation · 2024Review
- 3D printed zirconia used as dental materials: a critical review.Journal of biological engineering · 2023Review
- In Vitro and In Vivo Biological Assessments of 3D-Bioprinted Scaffolds for Dental Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Review
- 3D Printed and Bioprinted Membranes and Scaffolds for the Periodontal Tissue Regeneration: A Narrative Review.Membranes · 2022Review
- Research Dynamics of Tissue Spheroids as Building Blocks: A Scientometric Analysis.International journal of bioprinting · 2022Article
- Analysis of the knowledge landscape of three-dimensional bioprinting in Latin America.International journal of bioprinting · 2019Article
- Bioprinting in space and International Journal of Bioprinting stays ahead of the game.International journal of bioprinting · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedERRATUM.2020
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Science and technology (S&T) on three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is growing at an increasingly accelerated pace; one major challenge represents how to develop new solutions for frequent oral diseases such as periodontal problems and loss of alveolar bone. 3D bioprinting is expected to revolutionize the health industry in the upcoming years. In dentistry, this technology can become a significant contributor. This study applies a Competitive Technology Intelligence methodology to uncover the main S&T drivers in this domain. Looking at a 6-year period from 2012 to 2018 an analysis of scientific and technology production was made. Three principal S& T drivers were identified: Scaffolds development, analysis of natural and synthetic materials, and the study of scaffold characteristics. Innovative hybrid and multiphasic scaffolds are being developed to regenerate periodontal tissue and alveolar bone by combining them with stem cells from the pulp or periodontal ligament. To improve scaffolds performance, biodegradable synthetic polymers are often used in combination with bioceramics. The characteristics of scaffolds such as fiber orientation, porosity, and geometry, were also investigated. This research contributes to people interested in bringing innovative solutions to the health industry, particularly by applying state-of-the-art technologies such as 3D bioprinting, in this case for dental tissues and dental bone diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.