ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020
Use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for Operative Shoulder Outcomes.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining clinical significance following primary stabilization of posterior shoulder instability.JSES international · 2025Article
- Minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state associated with upper extremity patient-reported outcome measurement information system scores following the Latarjet procedure.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Article
- Concomitant Cervical Spine Disease Worsens PROMIS Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Young age, female sex, smoking, and worse area deprivation index associated with prolonged postoperative opioid use after rotator cuff repair.Shoulder & elbow · 2025Article
- Increased postoperative deltoid signal seen after suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: potential risk to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve.JSES international · 2025Article
- Can Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System estimate high-impact chronic pain after total shoulder arthroplasty?JSES international · 2024Article
- Analysis of factors associated with patient-reported outcome (PRO) score completion rate one year after shoulder surgeries.JSES international · 2024Article
- Effects of increased body mass index on one year outcomes following soft tissue arthroscopic shoulder instability repair.JSES international · 2023Article
- Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper extremity PROMIS scores following arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Comparison of the PROMIS and iHOT-12 in Determining Satisfaction Levels After Hip Arthroscopy for FAIS.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Determining the Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes on the PROMIS Upper Extremity Questionnaire After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFew studies have investigated the relationship between the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and legacy patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements. PURPOSE: To compare patient-reported outcomes from the PROMIS physical function (PF) and upper extremity (UE) platforms against one another and against legacy PRO measurements to assess the potential strengths and weaknesses of the National Institutes of Health PROMIS initiative and expand on the use of PRO measurements in clinical orthopaedic practice. STUDY
designSystematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
methodsA systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) guidelines. All English-language studies published between 2017 and 2019 using PROMIS to evaluate patients for shoulder surgery were analyzed. PROs were compared based on survey administered and the shoulder condition being investigated. Study quality was evaluated using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score.
resultsWe included 9 studies (5 studies were level 2; 3 studies were level 3; 1 study was level 4) encompassing a total of 1130 patients (60.2% male; mean age, 52.6 ± 16.5 years; mean BMI, 29.8 ± 2.8 kg/m
conclusionFrom available data, the PROMIS PF and PROMIS UE were most closely correlated with outcomes measured by the SF-36 GH. The PROMIS UE alone was most correlated with ASES Shoulder Score. Thus, either PROMIS PF or UE may provide a possible alternative to legacy PRO measurements but with a lower overall number of questions and higher generalizability. Future research should compare the time and question burden of the various PROMIS platforms with a more consistent evaluation of standard PRO measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.