Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32596267›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2020

A Review of the Types of Training Aids Used for Canine Detection Training.

Alison Simon, Lucia Lazarowski, Melissa Singletary, Jason Barrow, Kelly Van Arsdale, Thomas Angle, Paul Waggoner, Kathleen Giles

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Formulation and Delivery Systems of Cocaine and Methamphetamine Scent Mimics.International journal of analytical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Interpol Review of Drug Analysis 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alison SimonAGS Forensics, LLC, Washington, DC, United States.
Lucia LazarowskiCanine Performance Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Melissa SingletaryCanine Performance Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Jason BarrowFederal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory, Quantico, VA, United States.
Kelly Van ArsdaleFederal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory, Quantico, VA, United States.
Thomas AngleCanine Performance Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Paul WaggonerCanine Performance Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Kathleen GilesGiles Consulting, LLC, Huntington Beach, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The canine detection community is a diverse one, ranging from scientific fields such as behavior, genetics, veterinary medicine, chemistry, and biology to applications in law enforcement, military, medicine, and agricultural/environmental detection. This diversity has allowed for a flourishing and innovative community, yet it has also led to little acceptance and agreement on terminology. This is especially true when discussing the variety of training aids used in olfactory-based exercises. In general, authentic materials and pseudo-scents are the most commonly discussed, with the former accepted widely for training and certification, and the latter more often disregarded. However, as advances are made in the creation of training materials, alternative training aids are being introduced that do not fit into either of these categories. The misconceptions surrounding how these alternative training aids are manufactured has led to confusion on their classification, and therefore their reliance as an effective tool. This manuscript will review the existing language surrounding canine training aids, address relevant research revealing effectiveness, and clarify the different types based on their manufacture, chemical nature, and fundamental function.

Indexed as

canine detectionnon-pseudo alternativespseudosterminologytraining aids

Identifiers

PMID32596267
PMCPMC7301692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.