Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32596264›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Effects of Hypotonic and Isotonic Enteral Electrolyte Solutions Administered in Continuous Flow in Weaned Foals.

Lorena Chaves Monteiro, Rinaldo Batista Viana, Marcel Ferreira Bastos Avanza, Pedro Ancelmo Nunes Ermita, Caio Monteiro Costa, Samuel Rodrigues Alves, Paulo Vinícius de Morais Santos, Micheline Ozana da Silva, Daniel Atila de Barros Balbino, Felipe Sperandio de Mattos and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lorena Chaves MonteiroLaborary of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Rinaldo Batista VianaInstitute of Animal Health and Production, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Belém, Brazil.
Marcel Ferreira Bastos AvanzaLaborary of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Pedro Ancelmo Nunes ErmitaInstituto de Estudo dos Trópicos Úmidos, Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará, Xinguara, Brazil.
Caio Monteiro CostaLaborary of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Samuel Rodrigues AlvesLaborary of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Paulo Vinícius de Morais SantosLaborary of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Micheline Ozana da SilvaLaborary of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Daniel Atila de Barros BalbinoLaborary of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Felipe Sperandio de MattosLaborary of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Raffaella Bertoni Cavalcanti TeixeiraVeterinary Clinic and Surgery Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
José Dantas Ribeiro FilhoLaborary of Research in Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Department, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Viçosa · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará · BRUniversidade Federal Rural da Amazônia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of fluid therapy with maintenance enteral electrolytic solutions administered by nasogastric route in continuous flow have not previously been studied in weaned foals. This study primary goal was to compare the effects of two maintenance enteral electrolytic solutions administered by nasogastric route in continuous flow on the hydro electrolytic balance in weaned foals. This paper was a controlled trial in a cross-over design (6 × 2) performed in six foals with a mean age of 7.3 ± 1.4 months; each animal received two treatments, IsoES and HypoES, with an interval of 7 days between treatments. After 12 h of fasting, the animals were treated with enteral electrolyte solutions administered via nasogastric route in continuous flow in a volume of 15 mL/kg/h for 12 h. The evaluations were performed at T-12h (the beginning of the fasting), T0h (end of fasting and beginning of fluid therapy), T4h (4 h of fluid therapy), T8h (8 h of fluid therapy), T12h (end of fluid therapy), and T24h (12 h after the end of fluid therapy). Twelve hours of fasting resulted in a reduction (

Indexed as

electrolyte replacementfluid therapylow sodiummaintenance solutionsosmolarity

Identifiers

PMID32596264
PMCPMC7256653
OpenAlexW3026609447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.