Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32596250›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2020

A Guide to Diet-Microbiome Study Design.

Abigail J Johnson, Jack Jingyuan Zheng, Jea Woo Kang, Anna Saboe, Dan Knights, Angela M Zivkovic

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07742319 (The Effect of Soil Biodiversity on Human Gut Microbiome), which is not on this map. Cited by 81 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07742319 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Soil Biodiversity on Human Gut Microbiome: a Process Pilot Study (The HUMANITAS Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2026 to 2026Enrolled10ConditionsPilot StudyArmsLow diversity vegetable smoothie, High diversity vegetable smoothie
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Testosterone administration partially modulates gut microbiota responses to severe energy deficit.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abigail J JohnsonBioTechnology Institute, College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jack Jingyuan ZhengDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Jea Woo KangDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Anna SaboeBioTechnology Institute, College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Dan KnightsBioTechnology Institute, College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Angela M ZivkovicDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.

Funding

Early life antibiotics, gut microbiome development, and risk of childhood obesityR01AI121383 · NIAID · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI GERBER, JEFFREY STEPHEN, KNIGHTS, DAN · 2016 to 2020
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intense recent interest in understanding how the human gut microbiome influences health has kindled a concomitant interest in linking dietary choices to microbiome variation. Diet is known to be a driver of microbiome variation, and yet the precise mechanisms by which certain dietary components modulate the microbiome, and by which the microbiome produces byproducts and secondary metabolites from dietary components, are not well-understood. Interestingly, despite the influence of diet on the gut microbiome, the majority of microbiome studies published to date contain little or no analysis of dietary intake. Although an increasing number of microbiome studies are now collecting some form of dietary data or even performing diet interventions, there are no clear standards in the microbiome field for how to collect diet data or how to design a diet-microbiome study. In this article, we review the current practices in diet-microbiome analysis and study design and make several recommendations for best practices to provoke broader discussion in the field. We recommend that microbiome studies include multiple consecutive microbiome samples per study timepoint or phase and multiple days of dietary history prior to each microbiome sample whenever feasible. We find evidence that direct effects of diet on the microbiome are likely to be observable within days, while the length of an intervention required for observing microbiome-mediated effects on the host phenotype or host biomarkers, depending on the outcome, may be much longer, on the order of weeks or months. Finally, recent studies demonstrating that diet-microbiome interactions are personalized suggest that diet-microbiome studies should either include longitudinal sampling within individuals to identify personalized responses, or should include an adequate number of participants spanning a range of microbiome types to identify generalized responses.

Indexed as

dietdietary intakemethodologymicrobiomepersonalized nutritionstudy design

Identifiers

PMID32596250
PMCPMC7303276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.