Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32596238›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2020

Sialometric and Sialochemical Analysis in Individuals With Pulp Stones.

Marilisa Carneiro Leão Gabardo, Prescila Mota de Oliveira Kublitski, Isabela Rodrigues Sette, Thaís Lauschner, Mariana Martins Juglair, Flares Baratto-Filho, João Armando Brancher, Edgard Michel-Crosato

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marilisa Carneiro Leão GabardoSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, Brazil.
Prescila Mota de Oliveira KublitskiSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, Brazil.
Isabela Rodrigues SetteSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, Brazil.
Thaís LauschnerSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, Brazil.
Mariana Martins JuglairSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, Brazil.
Flares Baratto-FilhoSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, Brazil.
João Armando BrancherSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, Brazil.
Edgard Michel-CrosatoDepartment of Dentistry, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Positivo · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the saliva of patients with pulp stones, with sialometric and sialochemical tests. Eighty individuals, aged between18 and 65 years, of both sexes, were investigated. Patients were included in the pulp stone group when radiographic examination was suggestive of pulp stones in at least one permanent tooth, whereas those without this alteration were considered controls. Saliva was collected by stimulation, followed by salivary flowrate (SFR) and pH analysis tests. The organic components, such as urea (URE), glucose (GLU), total proteins (TPTs), alkaline phosphatase, creatinine (CRE), salivary amylase (SAM), and uric acid (URA), and the inorganic components, such as calcium, iron, and phosphorus, were evaluated by colorimetric techniques in an ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrophotometer. Differences among pulp stones and control groups were compared using Student's

Indexed as

dental pulp calcificationinorganic chemicalsorganic chemicalssalivasialochemistrysialometry

Identifiers

PMID32596238
PMCPMC7303886
OpenAlexW3034244746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.