ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020
Recognizing Ion Ligand-Binding Residues by Random Forest Algorithm Based on Optimized Dihedral Angle.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting the binding residues of four small molecule ligands by utilizing ensemble algorithms with additional correlation features.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- S-DCNN: prediction of ATP binding residues by deep convolutional neural network based on SMOTE.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Interaction Space.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Predicting CaBMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Prediction of metal ion ligand binding residues by adding disorder value and propensity factors based on deep learning algorithm.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Computation-Based Metal-Binding Prediction Approaches at the Residue Level.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- Recognition of Metal Ion Ligand-Binding Residues by Adding Correlation Features and Propensity Factors.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- The optimised model of predicting protein-metal ion ligand binding residues.IET systems biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prediction of ion ligand-binding residues in protein sequences is a challenging work that contributes to understand the specific functions of proteins in life processes. In this article, we selected binding residues of 14 ion ligands as research objects, including four acid radical ion ligands and 10 metal ion ligands. Based on the amino acid sequence information, we selected the composition and position conservation information of amino acids, the predicted structural information, and physicochemical properties of amino acids as basic feature parameters. We then performed a statistical analysis and reclassification for dihedral angle and proposed new methods on the extraction of feature parameters. The methods mainly included applying information entropy on the extraction of polarization charge and hydrophilic-hydrophobic information of amino acids and using position weight matrices on the extraction of position conservation information. In the prediction model, we used the random forest algorithm and obtained better prediction results than previous works. With the independent test, the Matthew's correlation coefficient and accuracy of 10 metal ion ligand-binding residues were larger than 0.07 and 52%, respectively; the corresponding evaluation values of four acid radical ion ligand-binding residues were larger than 0.15 and 86%, respectively. Further, we classified and combined the phi and psi angles and optimized prediction model for each ion ligand-binding residue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.