Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32596056›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Spatial patterns of bat diversity overlap with woodpecker abundance.

Dorota Kotowska, Marcin Zegarek, Grzegorz Osojca, Andrzej Satory, Tomas Pärt, Michał Żmihorski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorota KotowskaInstitute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland.
Marcin ZegarekMammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland.
Grzegorz OsojcaDepartment of Management and Logistics, Helena Chodkowska University of Technology and Economics, Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej SatoryNature and Forest Research Office, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomas PärtDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Michał ŻmihorskiMammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland.
Institute of Nature Conservation · PLMammal Research Institute · PLPolish Academy of Sciences · PLSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Woodpecker diversity is usually higher in natural forests rich in dead wood and old trees than in managed ones, thus this group of birds is regarded as an indicator of forest biodiversity. Woodpeckers excavate cavities which can be subsequently used by several bird species. As a consequence, their abundance indicates high avian abundance and diversity in forests. However, woodpecker-made holes may be also important for other animals, for example, mammals but it has seldom been investigated so far. Here, we examine how well one species, the Great Spotted Woodpecker, predicts species richness, occurrence and acoustic activity of bats in Polish pine forests. In 2011 we conducted woodpecker and bat surveys at 63 point-count sites in forests that varied in terms of stand age, structure and amount of dead wood. From zero to five Great Spotted Woodpeckers at a point-count site were recorded. The total duration of the echolocation calls during a 10-min visit varied from 0 to 542 s and the number of bat species/species groups recorded during a visit ranged between zero to five. The local abundance of the woodpecker was positively correlated with bat species richness (on the verge of significance), bat occurrence and pooled bat activity. The occurrence of

Indexed as

Bat communitiesDendrocopos majorIndicator speciesManaged forestWindthrow

Identifiers

PMID32596056
PMCPMC7306217
OpenAlexW3035892126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.