Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32595702›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020

Deciphering Cattle Temperament Measures Derived From a Four-Platform Standing Scale Using Genetic Factor Analytic Modeling.

Haipeng Yu, Gota Morota, Elfren F Celestino, Carl R Dahlen, Sarah A Wagner, David G Riley, Lauren L Hulsman Hanna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review with meta-analysis of heritability estimates for temperament-related traits in beef and dairy cattle populations.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haipeng YuDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Gota MorotaDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Elfren F CelestinoDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.
Carl R DahlenDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.
Sarah A WagnerDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.
David G RileyDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Lauren L Hulsman HannaDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The animal's reaction to human handling (i.e., temperament) is critical for work safety, productivity, and welfare. Subjective phenotyping methods have been traditionally used in beef cattle production. Even so, subjective scales rely on the evaluator's knowledge and interpretation of temperament, which may require substantial experience. Selection based on such subjective scores may not precisely change temperament preferences in cattle. The objectives of this study were to investigate the underlying genetic interrelationships among temperament measurements using genetic factor analytic modeling and validate a movement-based objective method (four-platform standing scale, FPSS) as a measure of temperament. Relationships among subjective methods of docility score (DS), temperament score (TS), 12 qualitative behavior assessment (QBA) attributes and objective FPSS including the standard deviation of total weight on FPSS over time (SSD) and coefficient of variation of SSD (CVSSD) were investigated using 1,528 calves at weaning age. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified two latent variables account for TS and 12 QBA attributes, termed

Indexed as

beef cattlefactor analysisfour-platform standing scaleprecision agriculturetemperament

Identifiers

PMID32595702
PMCPMC7304504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.