Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32595506›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020

Conventional Pig as Animal Model for Human Renal Drug Excretion Processes: Unravelling the Porcine Renal Function by Use of a Cocktail of Exogenous Markers.

Laura Dhondt, Siska Croubels, Peter De Paepe, Steven C Wallis, Saurabh Pandey, Jason A Roberts, Jeffrey Lipman, Pieter De Cock, Mathias Devreese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Laura DhondtDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Biochemistry, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Siska CroubelsDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Biochemistry, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Peter De PaepeHeymans Institute of Pharmacology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Steven C WallisUQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Saurabh PandeyUQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jason A RobertsUQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jeffrey LipmanUQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Pieter De CockHeymans Institute of Pharmacology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Mathias DevreeseDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Biochemistry, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Ghent University · BERoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over recent years, pigs have been promoted as potential animal model due to their anatomical and physiological similarities with humans. However, information about the contribution of distinct renal elimination processes [glomerular filtration rate (GFR), effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), tubular secretion, and reabsorption] in pigs is currently limited. Therefore, a cocktail of renal markers, consisting of iohexol (GFR), para-aminohippuric acid (ERPF and net tubular anion secretion), pindolol (net tubular cation secretion), and fluconazole (net tubular reabsorption) was administered intravenously to 7-week-old male conventional pigs. Plasma and urinary concentrations were determined using validated analytical methods. The clearance of iohexol (GFR) was 97.87 ± 16.05 ml/min/m² (mean ± SD). The ERPF, calculated as the renal clearance of PAH, was 226.77 ± 62.45 ml/min/m², whereas the net tubular secretion of PAH was 130.28 ± 52.62 ml/min/m². The net tubular secretion of R-pindolol and S-pindolol was 13.53 ± 12.97 and 18.01 ± 39.23 ml/min/m², respectively. The net tubular reabsorption of fluconazole was 78.32 ± 13.52 ml/min/m². Overall, this cocktail of renal markers was considered to be safe for use in pigs since no adverse effects were observed. Iohexol, PAH and fluconazole were considered suitable renal marker to assess the porcine renal function. Pindolol seems less appropriate due to the high degree of nonrenal clearance in pigs. The values of GFR, ERPF, and anion secretion are within the same range for both human and pig. Regarding the tubular reabsorption of fluconazole, slightly higher values were obtained for pigs. Nevertheless, these results indicate the conventional pig could be an appropriate animal model to study renal drug elimination processes in humans.

Indexed as

animal modelfluconazoleiohexolpara-aminohippuric acidpigletpindololrenal function

Identifiers

PMID32595506
PMCPMC7303324
OpenAlexW3037835273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.