Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32595465›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2020

A Machine Learning Approach for the Differential Diagnosis of Alzheimer and Vascular Dementia Fed by MRI Selected Features.

Gloria Castellazzi, Maria Giovanna Cuzzoni, Matteo Cotta Ramusino, Daniele Martinelli, Federica Denaro, Antonio Ricciardi, Paolo Vitali, Nicoletta Anzalone, Sara Bernini, Fulvia Palesi and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. AI-based differential diagnosis of dementia etiologies on multimodal data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Gloria CastellazziNMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, Faculty of Brain Sciences, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.
Maria Giovanna CuzzoniStroke Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Matteo Cotta RamusinoLaboratory of Neuropsychology and Unit of Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Daniele MartinelliDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Federica DenaroStroke Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Antonio RicciardiNMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, Faculty of Brain Sciences, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.
Paolo VitaliBrain MRI 3T Research Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Nicoletta AnzaloneScientific Institute H.S. Raffaele Vita e Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Sara BerniniLaboratory of Neuropsychology and Unit of Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Fulvia PalesiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Elena SinforianiLaboratory of Neuropsychology and Unit of Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Alfredo CostaLaboratory of Neuropsychology and Unit of Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Giuseppe MicieliDepartment of Emergency Neurology, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Egidio D'AngeloDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Giovanni MagenesBrain MRI 3T Research Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-KingshottNMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, Faculty of Brain Sciences, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among dementia-like diseases, Alzheimer disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VD) are two of the most frequent. AD and VD may share multiple neurological symptoms that may lead to controversial diagnoses when using conventional clinical and MRI criteria. Therefore, other approaches are needed to overcome this issue. Machine learning (ML) combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to improve the diagnostic accuracy of several neurodegenerative diseases, including dementia. To this end, in this study, we investigated, first, whether different kinds of ML algorithms, combined with advanced MRI features, could be supportive in classifying VD from AD and, second, whether the developed approach might help in predicting the prevalent disease in subjects with an unclear profile of AD or VD. Three ML categories of algorithms were tested: artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Multiple regional metrics from resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of 60 subjects (33 AD, 27 VD) were used as input features to train the algorithms and find the best feature pattern to classify VD from AD. We then used the identified VD-AD discriminant feature pattern as input for the most performant ML algorithm to predict the disease prevalence in 15 dementia patients with a "mixed VD-AD dementia" (MXD) clinical profile using their baseline MRI data. ML predictions were compared with the diagnosis evidence from a 3-year clinical follow-up. ANFIS emerged as the most efficient algorithm in discriminating AD from VD, reaching a classification accuracy greater than 84% using a small feature pattern. Moreover, ANFIS showed improved classification accuracy when trained with a multimodal input feature data set (e.g., DTI + rs-fMRI metrics) rather than a unimodal feature data set. When applying the best discriminant pattern to the MXD group, ANFIS achieved a correct prediction rate of 77.33%. Overall, results showed that our approach has a high discriminant power to classify AD and VD profiles. Moreover, the same approach also showed potential in predicting earlier the prevalent underlying disease in dementia patients whose clinical profile is uncertain between AD and VD, therefore suggesting its usefulness in supporting physicians' diagnostic evaluations.

Indexed as

Alzheimer diseaseDTImachine learningresting state fMRIvascular dementia

Identifiers

PMID32595465
PMCPMC7300291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.