Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32595422›Full record

ArticleAdvanced functional materials2018

3D Printed Stem-Cell Derived Neural Progenitors Generate Spinal Cord Scaffolds.

Daeha Joung, Vincent Truong, Colin C Neitzke, Shuang-Zhuang Guo, Patrick J Walsh, Joseph R Monat, Fanben Meng, Sung Hyun Park, James R Dutton, Ann M Parr and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced functional materials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 300 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Three-dimensional microelectrode arrays forBiomedical engineering letters · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Bioprinted Organoids: An Innovative Engine in Biomedicine.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 3D Printing for Neural Repair: Bridging the Gap in Regenerative Medicine.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. 3DMaterials today. Bio · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daeha JoungDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Vincent TruongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stem Cell Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Colin C NeitzkeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stem Cell Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Shuang-Zhuang GuoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Patrick J WalshDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stem Cell Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Joseph R MonatDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Fanben MengDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Sung Hyun ParkDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
James R DuttonStem Cell Institute, Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Ann M ParrDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stem Cell Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Michael C McAlpineDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
University of Minnesota · USStem Cell Institute · PA

Funding

3D Printed Nano-Bionic OrgansDP2EB020537 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MCALPINE, MICHAEL · 2014 to 2019
$2.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS DP2 EB020537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A bioengineered spinal cord is fabricated via extrusion-based multi-material 3D bioprinting, in which clusters of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived spinal neuronal progenitor cells (sNPCs) and oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) are placed in precise positions within 3D printed biocompatible scaffolds during assembly. The location of a cluster of cells, of a single type or multiple types, is controlled using a point-dispensing printing method with a 200 μm center-to-center spacing within 150 μm wide channels. The bioprinted sNPCs differentiate and extend axons throughout microscale scaffold channels, and the activity of these neuronal networks is confirmed by physiological spontaneous calcium flux studies. Successful bioprinting of OPCs in combination with sNPCs demonstrates a multicellular neural tissue engineering approach, where the ability to direct the patterning and combination of transplanted neuronal and glial cells can be beneficial in rebuilding functional axonal connections across areas of central nervous system (CNS) tissue damage. This platform can be used to prepare novel biomimetic, hydrogel-based scaffolds modeling complex CNS tissue architecture

Indexed as

3D bioprintinginduced pluripotent stem cellsneural progenitor cellsspinal cord scaffoldstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID32595422
PMCPMC7319181
OpenAlexW2887331259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.