ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2018
The Value of the Tei Index in Predicting Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tei Index Is a Useful Adjunctive Tool in the Diagnostic Workup of Patients with Acute Myocarditis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAn implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) decreases the risk of sudden death in the appropriate patients. However, a relationship between ICD shocks and increased mortality and morbidity has been suspected. This report is an investigation of an association between ICD shocks and the Tei index, an echocardiographic parameter now commonly used to predict cardiovascular events.
methodsThe basic characteristics of 250 patients with chronic heart failure who had an ICD implanted and 2 years of follow-up device recordings were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received shock therapy during follow-up were compared with those who did not, based on demographic and other characteristics and the Tei index.
resultsThe mean Tei index value of ICD shock recipients was significantly higher than the score of non-recipients of ICD shock (0.70±0.10 vs 0.56±0.10; p<0.001). The percentage of patients for whom it was primary prevention who received either appropriate or inappropriate ICD shocks was 28.9%, whereas in those who received an ICD for secondary prevention, the percentage was 71.1% (p<0.001). ICD shock recipient patients were older, and had a greater rate of hypertension and smoking pack-years compared with those to whom an ICD shock was not delivered (p<0.001).
conclusionThe results of this study demonstrated a relationship between the Tei index and ICD shocks, either appropriate or inappropriate. The Tei index is a simple method to predict ICD shocks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.