Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32595248›Full record

ArticleActa clinica Croatica2019

TREATMENT OF HUMERAL SHAFT FRACTURES: ANTEGRADE INTERLOCKING INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING WITH ADDITIONAL INTERLOCKING NEUTRALIZATION SCREWS THROUGH FRACTURE SITE.

Dinko Vidović, Ivan Benčić, Tomislav Ćuti, Domagoj Gajski, Tomislav Čengić, Marijo Bekić, Mario Zovak, Srećko Sabalić, Dejan Blažević

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 73% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dinko Vidović1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Surgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; 6University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia; 7Orthopedic and Traumatology Department, Dubrovnik General Hospital, Dubrovnik, Croatia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivan Benčić1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Surgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; 6University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia; 7Orthopedic and Traumatology Department, Dubrovnik General Hospital, Dubrovnik, Croatia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tomislav Ćuti1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Surgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; 6University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia; 7Orthopedic and Traumatology Department, Dubrovnik General Hospital, Dubrovnik, Croatia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.
Domagoj Gajski1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Surgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; 6University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia; 7Orthopedic and Traumatology Department, Dubrovnik General Hospital, Dubrovnik, Croatia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tomislav Čengić1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Surgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; 6University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia; 7Orthopedic and Traumatology Department, Dubrovnik General Hospital, Dubrovnik, Croatia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.
Marijo Bekić1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Surgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; 6University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia; 7Orthopedic and Traumatology Department, Dubrovnik General Hospital, Dubrovnik, Croatia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.
Mario Zovak1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Surgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; 6University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia; 7Orthopedic and Traumatology Department, Dubrovnik General Hospital, Dubrovnik, Croatia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.
Srećko Sabalić1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Surgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; 6University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia; 7Orthopedic and Traumatology Department, Dubrovnik General Hospital, Dubrovnik, Croatia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.
Dejan Blažević1Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Surgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 3School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; 6University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia; 7Orthopedic and Traumatology Department, Dubrovnik General Hospital, Dubrovnik, Croatia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare union time between two different nail designs for the treatment of humeral shaft fracture, i.e. antegrade interlocking intramedullary nail with and without additional interlocking neutralization screws. The retrospective study included 51 patients treated with antegrade humeral intramedullary nailing between January 2015 and December 2017. The inclusion criteria of the study were proximal and middle third humeral shaft fractures. Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria; 23 patients were treated with antegrade intramedullary nail with additional interlocking neutralization screws through fracture site (group A) and 28 patients were treated with antegrade intramedullary nail without additional interlocking neutralization screws (group B). Medical documentation and radiographic images taken preoperatively and postoperatively were reviewed. Radiological union was defined as cortical bridging of at least three of four cortices in two-plane radiographs, with disappearance of the fracture gap. There were no significant differences in union time between the groups (p>0.05). To our knowledge, this is the first report of antegrade interlocking humeral nailing with additional interlocking neutralization screws through fracture site. Hypothetical advantages of fracture gap reduction by additional interlocking neutralization screws to promote union were not confirmed by this first clinical trial.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone ScrewsAgedFemaleFracture FixationFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHumansHumeral FracturesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBone and bonesFracture fixation, intramedullaryHumeral fracturesHumerus

Identifiers

PMID32595248
PMCPMC7314309
OpenAlexW3029322306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.