Observational studyFukushima journal of medical science2020
Exhaled carbon monoxide levels in infants and toddlers with episodic asthma.
Observational study in Fukushima journal of medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exhaled carbon monoxide: variations due to collection method and physiology.Journal of breath research · 2025Article
- External Environmental Pollution as a Risk Factor for Asthma.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThere are few lung function tests available to evaluate bronchial asthma in infants and toddlers. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the measurement of exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) levels is applicable to evaluate infants and toddlers with stable asthma and during acute asthma attack.
methodsA one-way valve breath sampling bag was developed to collect the exhaled air of infants and toddlers. A total of 483 infants (under 2 years) and toddlers (2-5 years) were studied; 355 had an established diagnosis of asthma (182 suffering mild asthma attacks and 173 without active asthmatic symptoms), 119 had upper respiratory infection (URI) including acute bronchitis, and 9 were healthy.
resultsIn infants and toddlers, eCO levels of those with asthma attacks [median (interquartile range) = 2.0 (2.0-3.25) ppm, n=182] were significantly higher than those of subjects with asymptomatic asthma [2.0 (1.0-2.0) ppm, n=173, P < 0.0001], URI [2.0 (1.0-3.0) ppm, n=119, P < 0.0001], and healthy children [1.0 (0.0-1.0) ppm, n=9, P < 0.0001]. In 75 children with asthma petit mal, eCO levels during asthma attacks [3.0 (2.0-4.0) ppm] significantly decreased after therapy [1.0 (1.0-2.0) ppm, P < 0.0001]. In infants and toddlers with an established diagnosis of asthma (n=355), eCO cut-off >2 ppm discriminated asthma attack from an asymptomatic state with a sensitivity of 95.6%, a specificity of 43.3%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71 (95% CI:0.65-0.76, P < 0.0001). In 401 infants and toddlers with some respiratory symptoms, of which 285 cases were finally diagnosed as asthma [eCO level = 2.0 (2.0-3.0) ppm] and 116 cases were not asthma [eCO level = 2.0 (1.0-3.0) ppm, P < 0.0001], eCO cut-off >3 ppm supported the final diagnosis of asthma with a sensitivity of 38.9%, a specificity of 74.1%, and AUC of 0.63 (95% CI:0.56-0.69, P < 0.0001).
conclusionThe measurement of eCO by a novel method is applicable to evaluate asthmatic activity and treatment responsiveness, and to diagnose asthma in infants and toddlers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.