Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32594927›Full record

SynthesisEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2020

A meta-analysis of client-therapist perspectives on the therapeutic alliance: Examining the moderating role of type of measurement and diagnosis.

Libby Igra, Michal Lavidor, Dana Atzil-Slonim, Nitzan Arnon-Ribenfeld, Steven de Jong, Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Libby IgraDepartment of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1872-4539
Michal LavidorDepartment of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Dana Atzil-SlonimDepartment of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Nitzan Arnon-RibenfeldDepartment of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Steven de JongLentis Psychiatric Institute, Lentis Research & FACT noord- Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0421-3041
Ilanit Hasson-OhayonDepartment of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClients and therapists often have different perspectives on their therapeutic alliance (TA), affecting the process and outcome of therapy. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to assess the mean differences between clients' and therapists' estimations of TA among clients with severe disturbances, while focusing on two potential moderators: client diagnosis and alliance instrument.

methodWe conducted a systematic literature search of studies examining both client perspective and therapist perspective on TA in psychotherapy among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, personality disorders, and substance misuse disorders. We then analyzed the data using a random-effects meta-analytic model with Cohen's d standardized mean effect size.

resultsHeterogeneity analyses (k = 22, Cohen's d = -.46, 95% confidence interval = .31-1.1) produced a significant Q-statistic (Q = 94.96) and indicated high heterogeneity, suggesting that moderator analyses were appropriate.

conclusionsOur findings show that the type of TA instrument moderates the agreement on TA between client and therapist, but there was no indication of the client's diagnosis moderating the effect. The agreement between client and therapist estimations seems to be dependent on the instrument that is used to assess TA. Specific setting-related instruments seem to result in higher agreement between clients' and therapists' estimations than do more general instruments that are applied to assess TA.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsTherapeutic AllianceAdultHumansPersonality DisordersPsychotherapySchizophreniaSubstance-Related DisordersAgreementmeta-analysistherapeutic alliance

Identifiers

PMID32594927
PMCPMC7372164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.