Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32594880›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Time investments in rituals are associated with social bonding, affect and subjective health: a longitudinal study of Diwali in two Indian communities.

Purnima Singh, Shruti Tewari, Rebekka Kesberg, Johannes Alfons Karl, Joseph Bulbulia, Ronald Fischer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A Shared Intentionality Account of Uniquely Human Social Bonding.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Ritual explained: interdisciplinary answers to Tinbergen's four questions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Purnima SinghDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.
Shruti TewariHumanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Management, Indore, India.
Rebekka KesbergFakultät für Ingenieurswissenschaften, Informatik und Psychologie, Abteilung Sozialpsychologie, Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Johannes Alfons KarlSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Joseph BulbuliaSchool of Humanities, Faculty of Arts, Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ronald FischerSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Victoria University of Wellington · NZIndian Institute of Management Indore · INIndian Institute of Technology Delhi · INUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rituals are performed within specific socio-ecological niches, yet the different effects of the same ritual form across different niches (community contexts) remains unclear. Here, using longitudinal measures over a two-week period during Diwali (the Indian festival of light), we investigate the relationship between ritual time allocation and social cohesion in two Indian communities. First, the positive effects of ritual on social bonding, perceived health and affect were highest on the focal day of the festival. Second, we observed anticipatory effects of ritualistic commitment on affect prior to the main day of the festival. Third, social bonding patterns were similar in the two Indian settings, indicating that Diwali fosters social cohesion across diverse social ecologies (cultural niches). However, individually focused emotional benefits appear to dampened in more cosmopolitan environments. Finally, time investments reveal diminishing marginal utilities for ritual activities on social cognition. Ritual time investments were linked to greater affect and family cohesion up to a certain limit. We argue that attention to the diminishing returns of ritual time investments on social cohesion across diverse human ecologies is an important horizon for future cross-cultural investigations. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ritual renaissance: new insights into the most human of behaviours'.

Indexed as

AffectCeremonial BehaviorDiagnostic Self EvaluationSocial BehaviorHumansIndiaLongitudinal Studiescollective ritualDiwaliniche constructionsignalling theorysocial bonding

Identifiers

PMID32594880
PMCPMC7423265
OpenAlexW3037530874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.