Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32594868›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Church attendance and alloparenting: an analysis of fertility, social support and child development among English mothers.

John H Shaver, Eleanor A Power, Benjamin G Purzycki, Joseph Watts, Rebecca Sear, Mary K Shenk, Richard Sosis, Joseph A Bulbulia

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Men are less religious in more gender-equal countries.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ritual explained: interdisciplinary answers to Tinbergen's four questions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

John H ShaverReligion Programme, School of Social Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Eleanor A PowerDepartment of Methodology, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Benjamin G PurzyckiDepartment of the Study of Religion, Aarhus University, Jens Chr. Skous Vej 3, Building 1451, 525, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Joseph WattsReligion Programme, School of Social Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Rebecca SearDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Mary K ShenkDepartment of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16801, USA.
Richard SosisDepartment of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, U-2176, Storrs, CT 06269-2176, USA.
Joseph A BulbuliaMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Strasse 10, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Aarhus University · DKLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History · DEPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 102215/2/13/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many aspects of religious rituals suggest they provide adaptive benefits. Studies across societies consistently find that investments in ritual behaviour return high levels of cooperation. Another line of research finds that alloparental support to mothers increases maternal fertility and improves child outcomes. Although plausible, whether religious cooperation extends to alloparenting and/or affects child development remains unclear. Using 10 years of data collected from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), we test the predictions that church attendance is positively associated with social support and fertility (

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentChristianityFamily CharacteristicsMaternal BehaviorMothersAdultChildChild, PreschoolEnglandFamilyFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPsychosocial Support SystemsYoung AdultalloparentingALSPACcooperationfertilityritualsocial support

Identifiers

PMID32594868
PMCPMC7423262
OpenAlexW3038067259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.