Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32594617›Full record

ReviewANZ journal of surgery2020

Safe surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis.

David R Tivey, Sean S Davis, Joshua G Kovoor, Wendy J Babidge, Lorwai Tan, Thomas J Hugh, Trevor G Collinson, Peter J Hewett, Robert T A Padbury, Guy J Maddern

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ANZ journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Safety of Three-Dimensional versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Surgery triage during the COVID-19 pandemic.ANZ journal of surgery · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

David R TiveyResearch Audit and Academic Surgery, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2213-2576
Sean S DavisUniversity of Adelaide, Discipline of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5335-3270
Joshua G KovoorUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3880-3840
Wendy J BabidgeResearch Audit and Academic Surgery, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7063-7192
Lorwai TanResearch Audit and Academic Surgery, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8434-2988
Thomas J HughNorthern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6690-342X
Trevor G CollinsonGeneral Surgeons Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Peter J HewettUniversity of Adelaide, Discipline of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Robert T A PadburyFlinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Guy J MaddernResearch Audit and Academic Surgery, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2064-181X
Queen Elizabeth Hospital · AURoyal Australasian College of Surgeons · AUFlinders University · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has created a global pandemic. Surgical care has been impacted, with concerns raised around surgical safety, especially in terms of laparoscopic versus open surgery. Due to potential aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2, precautions during aerosol-generating procedures and production of surgical plume are paramount for the safety of surgical teams.

methodsA rapid review methodology was used with evidence sourced from PubMed, Departments of Health, surgical colleges and other health authorities. From this, a working group of expert surgeons developed recommendations for surgical safety in the current environment.

resultsPre-operative testing of surgical patients with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction does not guarantee lack of infectivity due to a demonstrated false-negative rate of up to 30%. All bodily tissues and fluids should therefore be treated as a potential source of COVID-19 infection during operative management. Caution must be taken, especially when using an energy source that produces surgical plumes, and an appropriate capture device should also be used. Limiting the use of such devices or using lower energy devices is desirable. To reduce perceived risks association with desufflation of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery, an appropriate suction irrigator system, attached to a high-efficiency particulate air filter, should be used. Additionally, appropriate use of personal protective equipment by the surgical team is necessary during high-risk aerosol-generating procedures.

conclusionsAs a result of the rapid review, evidence-based guidance has been produced to support safe surgical practice.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusPandemicsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Disease Transmission, InfectiousHumansPersonal Protective EquipmentPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Surgical Procedures, OperativeCOVID-19operativesafetyspecialties, surgicalstandardssurgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID32594617
PMCPMC7361254
OpenAlexW3037121549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.