SynthesisActa neurologica Belgica2020
Oral appliances in the treatment of oromandibular dystonia: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Orthodontic considerations for managing patients with functional movement disorders: a narrative review and clinical guide.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Movement disorders of the mouth: a review of the common phenomenologies.Journal of neurology · 2022Review
- Review
- Article
- Botulinum Toxin Therapy for Oromandibular Dystonia and Other Movement Disorders in the Stomatognathic System.Toxins · 2022Review
- Oral health and oral health-related quality of life in patients with oral dystonia indicates their need for dental special care.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2021Article
- Blepharospasm, Oromandibular Dystonia, and Meige Syndrome: Clinical and Genetic Update.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oromandibular dystonia (OMD) is a clinically and etiologically heterogeneous form of focal dystonia with variable social and functional implications. The results of pharmacological treatment and botulinum toxin infiltrations are often unsatisfactory. We performed a systematic review on the effects of oral and dental appliances in patients with OMD. Most of the reports in the literature are single subject descriptions or small case series with a considerable variability in the type of dystonia, the type of evaluated appliances and in the outcome measures. Only one report included a large group of unselected patients that were evaluated with a mixture of outcome measures. Although it appears that a number of OMD patients, especially those who benefit from sensory tricks, may sustain some improvement with the use of oral appliances, no definitive conclusions can be drawn about the type of patients that may benefit, nor about the preferred type or mode of appliance. More research in this field is needed, using standardized approaches and clearly defined outcome measures in larger cohorts of OMD patients that are clinically and diagnostically well characterized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.