ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2020
Pharmacists' Knowledge About the Impact of Augmented Renal Clearance on Antimicrobial Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmented renal clearance: from pathophysiological mechanisms to clinical implications and research perspectives.Renal failure · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBroad-spectrum antibiotics are commonly prescribed in critically ill patients. While it is commonly believed that only patients with impaired renal function need dose adjustment, augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a phenomenon that warrants dose adjustment as well. In critically ill patients ARC is often undetectable because it is associated with a normal or decreased serum creatinine concentration (SCr). This study's objective was to assess pharmacists' knowledge about ARC identification, risk factors, affected antimicrobials, and dosing of antibiotics in patients with ARC.
methodsIn January 2020, we carried out a cross-sectional study by sending out an online survey to the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, Kuwait Pharmaceutical Association, and Oman Pharmaceutical Society. Due to the expected low response rate, we administered an electronic questionnaire to pharmacists attending Dubai International Pharmaceuticals and Technologies Conference and Exhibition 2020 (DUPHAT).
resultsData were collected from 288 respondents. However, only 134 were included in the final analysis following the exclusion of incomplete responses, no experience working in in-patient settings, and respondents who chose "no" universal ARC definition. Those who chose "yes" or "I do not know" regarding the universal definition of ARC were asked about SCr status in ARC. Elevation in SCr was chosen by 67/134 (50%) compared to those who chose decreased or normal (48/134, 35.8%). Regarding risk factors, only 1/134 (0.7%) respondent selected all risk factors. Two/134 (1.4%) respondents chose all hydrophilic antibiotics that are likely to be affected by ARC. Concerning the appropriate dose and frequency of piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem, they were selected by 60.4% and 30.5%, respectively.
conclusionPharmacists' knowledge about ARC was limited. Implementation of educational programs targeting hospital pharmacists, especially those practicing in critical care settings, and developing antimicrobial institutional guidelines are important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.