ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Numerical study of the building pressure cycling method for evaluating vapor intrusion from groundwater contamination.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vapor intrusion (VI) risk assessments determine the cleanup level of groundwater in the absence of ingestion. In recent VI investigations, the building pressure cycling (BPC) method has been applied to help minimize ambiguity caused by temporal variability of indoor air samples that are important to risk assessments, and, consequently, determine groundwater cleanup level accurately. In this study, we use a three-dimensional numerical model to examine the dynamic migration of VOCs from groundwater after the application of BPC. First, we validated the numerical model with field measurements. Then, the verified model is used to investigate the effects of site-specific features in determining the performance of BPC operation. At last, we summarize past field applications of BPC to examine the simulated results. Our study indicates that the BPC-induced indoor depressurization can increase the building loading rate in the first 2-3 h, which would then drop to 2-3 times of that with natural conditions in most cases of groundwater contamination. In some cases involving a strong source, e.g., a vapor source above the capillary fringe or a groundwater source with sandy soil above the groundwater level, the normalized building loading rates can be maintained as high as 4-9 without decrease after the first 2-3 h. Significantly higher increase in building loading rate may indicate a potential presence of a preferential pathway between the groundwater contamination and concerned building.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32594447What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.