Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32594447›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Numerical study of the building pressure cycling method for evaluating vapor intrusion from groundwater contamination.

Yanqiu Liu, Jun Man, Yue Wang, Yuting Xiao, Wei Tang, Qiang Chen, Yijun Yao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yanqiu LiuCollege of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Jun ManKey Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Yue WangKey Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Yuting XiaoKey Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Wei TangKey Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Qiang ChenState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Soil Environmental Management and Pollution Control, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Nanjing, 210042, China.
Yijun YaoKey Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China. Yijun_Yao@ISSAS.AC.CN.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFC1801100National Natural Science Foundation of China 41771494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vapor intrusion (VI) risk assessments determine the cleanup level of groundwater in the absence of ingestion. In recent VI investigations, the building pressure cycling (BPC) method has been applied to help minimize ambiguity caused by temporal variability of indoor air samples that are important to risk assessments, and, consequently, determine groundwater cleanup level accurately. In this study, we use a three-dimensional numerical model to examine the dynamic migration of VOCs from groundwater after the application of BPC. First, we validated the numerical model with field measurements. Then, the verified model is used to investigate the effects of site-specific features in determining the performance of BPC operation. At last, we summarize past field applications of BPC to examine the simulated results. Our study indicates that the BPC-induced indoor depressurization can increase the building loading rate in the first 2-3 h, which would then drop to 2-3 times of that with natural conditions in most cases of groundwater contamination. In some cases involving a strong source, e.g., a vapor source above the capillary fringe or a groundwater source with sandy soil above the groundwater level, the normalized building loading rates can be maintained as high as 4-9 without decrease after the first 2-3 h. Significantly higher increase in building loading rate may indicate a potential presence of a preferential pathway between the groundwater contamination and concerned building.

Indexed as

GroundwaterSoil PollutantsGasesRisk AssessmentSoilGasesSoilSoil PollutantsBuilding pressure cycling methodChlorinated solvent vapor intrusionContaminated groundwater sourceRisk assessmentSoil textureThree-dimensional numerical model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.