Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32594366›Full record

ArticleEndocrine pathology2020

Identification of Recurrent TERT Promoter Mutations in Intrathyroid Thymic Carcinomas.

Ippei Tahara, Naoki Oishi, Kunio Mochizuki, Toshio Oyama, Kazuyuki Miyata, Akira Miyauchi, Mitsuyoshi Hirokawa, Ryohei Katoh, Tetsuo Kondo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Case Report and Literature Review: Intrathyroid Thymic Carcinoma.Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ippei TaharaDepartment of Pathology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan.
Naoki OishiDepartment of Pathology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan.
Kunio MochizukiDepartment of Pathology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan.
Toshio OyamaDepartment of Pathology, Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan.
Kazuyuki MiyataDepartment of Pathology, Kofu Municipal Hospital, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan.
Akira MiyauchiDepartment of Surgery, Kuma Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Mitsuyoshi HirokawaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kuma Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Ryohei KatohDepartment of Pathology, Ito hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuo KondoDepartment of Pathology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan. ktetsuo@yamanashi.ac.jp.
University of Yamanashi · JPKuma Hospital · JPIto Hospital · JPYamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital · JPYamanashi Research Institute · JP

Funding

the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology-Japan, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 19K07412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrathyroid thymic carcinoma (ITTC) is a rare malignant neoplasm considered to be a eutopic thymic carcinoma (TC) arising ectopically in the thyroid. Histopathologically, ITTC resembles squamous cell carcinoma of the thymus with positive TC markers such as CD5 and c-KIT. Despite these similar histological findings, ITTC is clinically less aggressive than TC. In this study, we compared clinical, histological, and genetic characteristics of ITTCs and TCs. We collected 9 ITTCs and 8 TCs with their clinicopathological profiles. Immunohistochemistry for CD5, p63, CD117/c-KIT, Ki-67, p53, TTF-1, thyroglobulin, PAX8, EGFR, and PD-L1/CD274 plus in situ hybridization for EBER was performed. We further investigated mutation status of KIT, EGFR, BRAF, and TERT promoter using Sanger sequencing. In our study, ITTCs affected significantly younger patients than TCs. After a mean follow-up of 86 months, all patients with ITTC were alive, while two patients with TC had died. Immunohistochemistry showed ITTCs and TCs had a similar immunophenotype except for EGFR and p53. Genetic analysis did not identify KIT or BRAF mutations in any ITTCs or TCs. EGFR mutations were positive in 11% (1/9) of ITTCs and 25% (2/8) of TCs. Notably, TERT promoter C228T mutation was identified in 22% (2/9) of ITTCs but none of the TCs. There were no significant differences in age, tumor size, or sex between TERT-mutated and TERT-wild-type ITTCs. Collectively, ITTC and TC have similar histopathologic and immunophenotypic features but different clinical outcomes. Recurrent TERT promoter mutation may be a key event related to cancer progression in ITTCs and warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCase-Control StudiesChoristomaFemaleGene FrequencyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPromoter Regions, GeneticTelomeraseTertiary Lymphoid StructuresThymomaThymus GlandThymus NeoplasmsTelomeraseTERT protein, humanc-KITEGFRIntrathyroid thymic carcinoma (ITTC)TERT promoter mutationThymic carcinoma (TC)

Identifiers

PMID32594366
OpenAlexW3037911466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.