Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32594365›Full record

SynthesisCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2020

A Systematic Review of Recent Methodological Approaches for Using Ecological Momentary Assessment to Examine Outcomes in U.S. Based HIV Research.

Sabrina L Smiley, Norweeta G Milburn, Kate Nyhan, Tamara Taggart

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Geolocation, ethics, and HIV research.Health and technology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sabrina L SmileyDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. slsmiley@usc.edu.
Norweeta G MilburnDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Division of Population Behavior Health, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kate NyhanYale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Tamara TaggartDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
George Washington University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Southern California · USYale University · US

Funding

UCLA Implementation Science and Substance Use Research and Education (ISSURE) ProgramR25DA035692 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TIMOTHY W FONG, GAIL E. WYATT · 2013 to 2026
$3.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA035692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn recent years, researchers have been adopting and using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods via technology devices for real-time measurement of exposures and outcomes in HIV research. To assess and critically evaluate how EMA methods are currently being used in HIV research, we systematically reviewed recent published literature (October 2017-October 2019) and searched select conference databases for 2018 and 2019. RECENT

findingsOur searches identified 8 published articles that used EMA via smartphone app, a handheld Personal Digital Assistant, and web-based survey programs for real-time measurement of HIV-related exposures and outcomes in behavioral research. Overall trends include use of EMA and technology devices to address substance use, HIV primary prevention (e.g., condom use and preexposure prophylaxis), and HIV treatment (medication adherence). This review supports the use of EMA methods in HIV research and recommends that researchers use EMA methods to measure psychosocial factors and social contexts and with Black and Latinx samples of gay and bisexual men, transgender women, and cisgendered women to reflect current HIV disparities in the U.S.A.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringEcological Momentary AssessmentComputers, HandheldEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, FemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansMalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexual BehaviorSmartphoneSubstance-Related DisordersEcological momentary assessmentHIVMedication adherenceMobile phonePrevention

Identifiers

PMID32594365
PMCPMC11230647
OpenAlexW3037449445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.