Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32594346›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2020

Near-infrared transillumination with high dynamic range imaging for occlusal caries detection in vitro.

Friederike Litzenburger, Alexander Lederer, Maximilian Kollmuß, Reinhard Hickel, Karl-Heinz Kunzelmann, Katrin Heck

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Atlas of Dental Near-Infrared Transillumination Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Friederike LitzenburgerDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336, Munich, Germany. soechtig@dent.med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0031-6219
Alexander LedererDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Maximilian KollmußDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Reinhard HickelDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Karl-Heinz KunzelmannDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Katrin HeckDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess near-infrared transillumination with high dynamic range imaging (NIRT-HDRI) for occlusal caries detection in vitro and to compare it with visual inspection using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System II (ICDAS) and digital bitewing radiography (BWR). Sixty-one extracted permanent molars with sound or occlusal carious surfaces without severe cavitation were visually assembled. Two examiners assessed twice these surfaces independently using ICDAS, BWR and NIRT-HDRI. The latter was performed with a prototype consisting of two laser sources (780 nm), a CCD sensor and subsequent processing with image analysis software. Thresholds for carious surfaces, enamel and dentin lesions were defined for all methods. Micro-computed tomography served as the reference standard. Linear weighted Kappa analysis of the methods versus the reference at the threshold carious surface, enamel and dentin lesion revealed 0.59/0.08/0.12 for ICDAS, 0.37/- 0.06/0.58 for BWR and 0.33/- 0.01/0.51 for NIRT-HDRI. Sensitivity values at the three thresholds were 0.85/0.78/0.13 for ICDAS, 0.59/0.00/0.69 for BWR and 0.98/0.33/0.78 for NIRT. Specificity values at the three thresholds were 0.70/0.40/1.00 for ICDAS, 0.9./0.96/0.90 for BWR and 0.30/0.65/0.72 for NIRT-HDRI. Reliability analysis revealed substantial agreement for BWR and NIRT and almost perfect agreement for ICDAS. NIRT exhibited a strong ability to identify occlusal dental decay in general; however, it revealed a tendency towards overestimation. Its strength was the detection of dentin caries lesions compared with ICDAS and BWR. NIRT-HDRI seems to be a suitable method to detect hidden dentin caries as a supplement to visual examination.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalInfrared RaysTransilluminationDental CariesDental EnamelDentinHumansReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveX-Ray MicrotomographyDental cariesDiagnostic imagingNear-infrared transilluminationOcclusal cariesX-ray microtomographyX-rays

Identifiers

PMID32594346
OpenAlexW3037001008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.