ArticleLasers in medical science2020
Near-infrared transillumination with high dynamic range imaging for occlusal caries detection in vitro.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-Wave Infrared Reflectance at 1050-1550 nm for Proximal Caries Detection: An In Vitro Diagnostic Accuracy Study Validated by Micro-CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Atlas of Dental Near-Infrared Transillumination Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Visualization of carious lesions with polarized and depolarized light microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Detection, Diagnosis, and Monitoring of Early Caries: The Future of Individualized Dental Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Recent development of photoacoustic imaging in dentistry: A review on studies over the last decade.The Saudi dental journal · 2023Review
- Photoacoustic imaging of hidden dental caries using visible-light diode laser.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Accuracy of high definition near infrared transillumination camera in detection of hidden proximal caries.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2023Article
- New Caries Diagnostic Tools in Intraoral Scanners: A Comparative In Vitro Study to Established Methods in Permanent and Primary Teeth.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Near-infrared reflection at 780 nm for detection of early proximal caries in posterior permanent teeth in vitro.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2021Article
- Comparison of novel and established caries diagnostic methods: a clinical study on occlusal surfaces.BMC oral health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess near-infrared transillumination with high dynamic range imaging (NIRT-HDRI) for occlusal caries detection in vitro and to compare it with visual inspection using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System II (ICDAS) and digital bitewing radiography (BWR). Sixty-one extracted permanent molars with sound or occlusal carious surfaces without severe cavitation were visually assembled. Two examiners assessed twice these surfaces independently using ICDAS, BWR and NIRT-HDRI. The latter was performed with a prototype consisting of two laser sources (780 nm), a CCD sensor and subsequent processing with image analysis software. Thresholds for carious surfaces, enamel and dentin lesions were defined for all methods. Micro-computed tomography served as the reference standard. Linear weighted Kappa analysis of the methods versus the reference at the threshold carious surface, enamel and dentin lesion revealed 0.59/0.08/0.12 for ICDAS, 0.37/- 0.06/0.58 for BWR and 0.33/- 0.01/0.51 for NIRT-HDRI. Sensitivity values at the three thresholds were 0.85/0.78/0.13 for ICDAS, 0.59/0.00/0.69 for BWR and 0.98/0.33/0.78 for NIRT. Specificity values at the three thresholds were 0.70/0.40/1.00 for ICDAS, 0.9./0.96/0.90 for BWR and 0.30/0.65/0.72 for NIRT-HDRI. Reliability analysis revealed substantial agreement for BWR and NIRT and almost perfect agreement for ICDAS. NIRT exhibited a strong ability to identify occlusal dental decay in general; however, it revealed a tendency towards overestimation. Its strength was the detection of dentin caries lesions compared with ICDAS and BWR. NIRT-HDRI seems to be a suitable method to detect hidden dentin caries as a supplement to visual examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.