Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32594287›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2020

Comparison of outcomes of Burch colposuspension and transobturator tape and single incision needleless procedures (DynaMesh

Yesim Akdemir, Fadime Dincer, Cagatay Buyukuysal, Ulku Ozmen, Muge Harma, Mehmet Ibrahim Harma

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Burch Procedure: A Historical Perspective.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yesim AkdemirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak BEÜ, Esenköy, Kozlu, 67000, Zonguldak, Turkey. yesimakdemir@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8574-5065
Fadime DincerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak BEÜ, Esenköy, Kozlu, 67000, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Cagatay BuyukuysalDepartment of of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Ulku OzmenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak BEÜ, Esenköy, Kozlu, 67000, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Muge HarmaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak BEÜ, Esenköy, Kozlu, 67000, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Mehmet Ibrahim HarmaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak BEÜ, Esenköy, Kozlu, 67000, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Bülent Ecevit University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWomen with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) often require combined pelvic reconstructive surgeries because of shared risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacies of Burch colposuspension, transobturator tape (TOT), and single-incision needleless (DynaMesh

methodsWe performed this retrospective cohort study that comprising 122 patients who either underwent Burch colposuspension (n:43), TOT (n:40), or SIS (n:39) procedures along with pelvic reconstructive surgery or hysterectomy between January 2010 and July 2018. During the clinical follow-up, we analyzed cure rates, and surgical success rates of SUI surgery, quality of life, and symptom severity by IIQ-7, UDI-6, SSI, SSQ-8, OAB-V8, and PGI-I scale scores. The primary outcome was surgical success, whereas secondary outcomes included complications and patient-reported outcomes in the quality of life.

resultsWe found that surgical success rates were higher in Burch group than SIS group and higher in TOT group than in SIS group (88.4% vs 61.5% and 87.5% vs 61.5%, p = 0.003). The quality of life was lower in SIS group than in Burch group.

conclusionsBoth Burch and TOT are effective procedures in patients with SUI who require additional pelvic surgeries. Although surgical outcomes of SIS procedure in patients with SUI who underwent concomitant pelvic surgeries in our study were not promising, further studies with SIS are needed to clarify these observations.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsAdultCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapseRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, StressUrologic Surgical ProceduresUterine DiseasesBurch colposuspensionConcomitant surgeryPelvic reconstructive surgerySingle incision slingStress urinary incontinenceTransobturator tape

Identifiers

PMID32594287
OpenAlexW3037790171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.