Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32594285›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2020

Radiotherapy treatment scheduling considering time window preferences.

Bruno Vieira, Derya Demirtas, Jeroen B van de Kamer, Erwin W Hans, Louis-Martin Rousseau, Nadia Lahrichi, Wim H van Harten

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Waiting time interpretations: Complexity and consequences for radiotherapy delays.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruno VieiraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. b.vieira@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6045-9233
Derya DemirtasCenter for Healthcare Operations Improvement and Research (CHOIR), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Jeroen B van de KamerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin W HansCenter for Healthcare Operations Improvement and Research (CHOIR), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Louis-Martin RousseauMathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1J4, Canada.
Nadia LahrichiMathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1J4, Canada.
Wim H van HartenDivision of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLPolytechnique Montréal · CAUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 2014-6078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

External-beam radiotherapy treatments are delivered by a linear accelerator (linac) in a series of high-energy radiation sessions over multiple days. With the increase in the incidence of cancer and the use of radiotherapy (RT), the problem of automatically scheduling RT sessions while satisfying patient preferences regarding the time of their appointments becomes increasingly relevant. While most literature focuses on timeliness of treatments, several Dutch RT centers have expressed their need to include patient preferences when scheduling appointments for irradiation sessions. In this study, we propose a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model that solves the problem of scheduling and sequencing RT sessions considering time window preferences given by patients. The MILP model alone is able to solve the problem to optimality, scheduling all sessions within the desired window, in reasonable time for small size instances up to 66 patients and 2 linacs per week. For larger centers, we propose a heuristic method that pre-assigns patients to linacs to decompose the problem in subproblems (clusters of linacs) before using the MILP model to solve the subproblems to optimality in a sequential manner. We test our methodology using real-world data from a large Dutch RT center (8 linacs). Results show that, combining the heuristic with the MILP model, the problem can be solved in reasonable computation time with as few as 2.8% of the sessions being scheduled outside the desired time window.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesPatient PreferenceRadiotherapyHumansNetherlandsNuclear Medicine Department, HospitalParticle AcceleratorsProgramming, LinearTime FactorsMathematical programmingOperations managementOperations researchPatient preferencesRadiotherapy schedulingTime windows

Identifiers

PMID32594285
PMCPMC7676074
OpenAlexW3037409320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.