ReviewClinical rheumatology2020
Bilateral swelling of the forearms revealing muscular sarcoidosis: a case-based review.
Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proximal myopathy: causes and associated conditions.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Muscular sarcoidosis is rarely symptomatic and mainly affects proximal muscles of the lower extremities. However, the distal localization in the upper extremities is rare. We used systematic approach to analyze all relevant literature review and we identified only three cases of muscular sarcoidosis of the upper extremities. We report the case of a 56-year-old woman who presented distal and bilateral swelling of the extensor surface of the forearms revealing muscular sarcoidosis. The laboratory exams associated elevated acute phase reactants with elevated serum angiotensin-converting enzyme levels and normal serum muscle enzymes. Ultrasound and MRI showed a bilateral and symmetrical muscle hypertrophy of the extensors of the fingers. Histological examination of muscle specimen and minor salivary gland biopsy revealed noncaseating epithelioid-cell granulomas. Therefore, the diagnosis of muscular sarcoidosis of the finger extensor muscles was made. Swelling of the forearms disappeared gradually under prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day. We used methotrexate as a steroid-sparing agent. Muscular MRI in sarcoidosis is not specific, but is to make a diagnosis of the lesion to optimize the biopsy which the cornerstone of the diagnosis ofsarcoidosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.