ArticleMicrobial ecology2021
Individual and Site-Specific Variation in a Biogeographical Profile of the Coyote Gastrointestinal Microbiota.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- First insights into the Drivers of the Cloacal Microbiome of the Wild Platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus).Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- Double-Edged Sword: Urbanization and Response of Amniote Gut Microbiome in the Anthropocene.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Seasonal Variation in the Diversity of the Gut Microbiota of Short-Faced Moles Reveals the Associations of Climatic Factors on the Gut Microbiota of Subterranean Mammals.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Skin microbiomes of frogs vary among body regions, revealing differences that reflect known patterns of chytrid infection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Differences in the luminal and mucosal gut microbiomes and metabolomes of oriental rat snake (Ptyas mucosus).Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Taxonomic, Genomic, and Functional Variation in the Gut Microbiomes of Wild Spotted Hyenas Across 2 Decades of Study.mSystems · 2023Article
- Diet and high altitude strongly drive convergent adaptation of gut microbiota in wild macaques, humans, and dogs to high altitude environments.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Microbiome of the freshwater sponge Ephydatia muelleri shares compositional and functional similarities with those of marine sponges.The ISME journal · 2022Article
- Gastrointestinal Biogeography of Luminal Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Sika Deer (Cervus nippon).Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022Article
- The effect of environment on intestinal microbial diversity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Wolves, dogs and humans in regular contact can mutually impact each other's skin microbiota.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Social environment and genetics underlie body site-specific microbiomes of Yellowstone National Park gray wolves (Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- An altered microbiome in urban coyotes mediates relationships between anthropogenic diet and poor health.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Most knowledge of the vertebrate gut microbiota comes from fecal samples; due to difficulties involved in sample collection, the upper intestinal microbiota is poorly understood in wild animals despite its potential to inform broad interpretations about host-gut microbe relationships under natural conditions. Here, we used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize the microbiota of wild coyotes (Canis latrans) along the gastrointestinal tract, including samples from the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum, ascending and descending colon, and feces. We used this intestinal profile to (1) quantify how intestinal site and individual identity interact to shape the microbiota in an uncontrolled setting, and (2) evaluate whether the fecal microbiota adequately represent other intestinal sites. Microbial communities in the large intestine were distinct from those in the small intestine, with higher diversity and a greater abundance of anaerobic taxa. Within each of the small and large intestine, individual identity explained significantly more among-sample variation than specific intestinal sites, revealing the importance of individual variation in the microbiota of free-living animals. Fecal samples were not an adequate proxy for studying upper intestinal environments, as they contained only half the amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) present in the small intestine at three- to four-fold higher abundances. Our study is a unique biogeographical investigation of the microbiota using free-living mammals rather than livestock or laboratory organisms and provides a foundational understanding of the gastrointestinal microbiota in a wild canid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.