ArticleEuropean radiology2020
Clinically significant prostate cancer detection and segmentation in low-risk patients using a convolutional neural network on multi-parametric MRI.
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning for fully automatic detection, segmentation, and Gleason grade estimation of prostate cancer in multiparametric magnetic resonance images.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- AI-Assisted Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Using Biparametric MRI and PI-RADS v2.1: Performance Comparison Between Novice-Level and Experienced Readers.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Real-world assessment of a deep learning neural network algorithm for prostate cancer detection in MRI using true de novo data.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Exploring the utility of artificial intelligence in identifying progression of prostate cancer during active surveillance: A systematic review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Review
- From prostate-specific antigen to precision: The future of prostate cancer diagnosis with artificial intelligence, biomarkers, and imaging.Current urology · 2026Review
- Current Applications and Future Directions of Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence and Restriction Spectrum Imaging for Patient-level Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Prostate MRI: Current Evidence and Clinical Translation Challenges-A Narrative Review.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
- Beyond PSA: The Future of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Using Artificial Intelligence, Novel Biomarkers, and Advanced Imagery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enhanced ISUP grade prediction in prostate cancer using multi-center radiomics data.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Generalist medical foundation model improves prostate cancer segmentation from multimodal MRI images.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The Accuracy of Biparametric Prostate MRI in the Pathway of Patients With Prostate Cancer.Cureus · 2025Article
- MRI characteristics predict risk of pathological upgrade in patients with ISUP grade group 1 prostate cancer.European radiology · 2025Article
- Augmented Reality for Surgical Navigation: A Review of Advanced Needle Guidance Systems for Percutaneous Tumor Ablation.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Review
- Enhancing cancer risk awareness and screening management through artificial intelligence: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Integration of magnetic resonance imaging and deep learning for prostate cancer detection: a systematic review.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2025Review
- A depth analysis of recent innovations in non-invasive techniques using artificial intelligence approach for cancer prediction.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Review
- Factors of interobserver variability in prostate tumor MRI delineation: impact of PI-QUAL score.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Enhancing the diagnostic capacity of [EJNMMI reports · 2024Article
- Interactive Cascaded Network for Prostate Cancer Segmentation from Multimodality MRI with Automated Quality Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop an automatic method for identification and segmentation of clinically significant prostate cancer in low-risk patients and to evaluate the performance in a routine clinical setting.
methodsA consecutive cohort (n = 292) from a prospective database of low-risk patients eligible for the active surveillance was selected. A 3-T multi-parametric MRI at 3 months after inclusion was performed. Histopathology from biopsies was used as reference standard. MRI positivity was defined as PI-RADS score ≥ 3, histopathology positivity was defined as ISUP grade ≥ 2. The selected cohort contained four patient groups: (1) MRI-positive targeted biopsy-positive (n = 116), (2) MRI-negative systematic biopsy-negative (n = 55), (3) MRI-positive targeted biopsy-negative (n = 113), (4) MRI-negative systematic biopsy-positive (n = 8). Group 1 was further divided into three sets and a 3D convolutional neural network was trained using different combinations of these sets. Two MRI sequences (T2w, b = 800 DWI) and the ADC map were used as separate input channels for the model. After training, the model was evaluated on the remaining group 1 patients together with the patients of groups 2 and 3 to identify and segment clinically significant prostate cancer.
resultsThe average sensitivity achieved was 82-92% at an average specificity of 43-76% with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.65 to 0.89 for different lesion volumes ranging from > 0.03 to > 0.5 cc.
conclusionsThe proposed deep learning computer-aided method yields promising results in identification and segmentation of clinically significant prostate cancer and in confirming low-risk cancer (ISUP grade ≤ 1) in patients on active surveillance. KEY POINTS: • Clinically significant prostate cancer identification and segmentation on multi-parametric MRI is feasible in low-risk patients using a deep neural network. • The deep neural network for significant prostate cancer localization performs better for lesions with larger volumes sizes (> 0.5 cc) as compared to small lesions (> 0.03 cc). • For the evaluation of automatic prostate cancer segmentation methods in the active surveillance cohort, the large discordance group (MRI positive, targeted biopsy negative) should be included.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.