Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32593840›Full record

ArticleEnvironment international2020

Uptake, phytovolatilization, and interconversion of 2,4-dibromophenol and 2,4-dibromoanisole in rice plants.

Qing Zhang, Wenqian Kong, Linfeng Wei, Yingjun Wang, Yadan Luo, Pu Wang, Jiyan Liu, Jerald L Schnoor, Guibin Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Qing ZhangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; School of Environment, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Wenqian KongState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; School of Environment, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Linfeng WeiState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; School of Environment, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Yingjun WangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; School of Environment, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Yadan LuoState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; School of Environment, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Pu WangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; School of Environment, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Jiyan LiuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; School of Environment, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China. Electronic address: liujy@rcees.ac.cn.
Jerald L SchnoorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Guibin JiangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; School of Environment, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Training CoreP42ES013661 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANS-JOACHIM LEHMLER · 2006 to 2026
$60.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES013661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural analogs, 2,4-dibromophenol (2,4-DBP) and 2,4-dibromoanisole (2,4-DBA), have both natural and artificial sources and are frequently detected in environmental matrices. Their environmental fates, especially volatilization, including both direct volatilization from cultivation solution and phytovolatilization through rice plants were evaluated using hydroponic exposure experiments. Results showed that 2,4-DBA displayed stronger volatilization tendency and more bioaccumulation in aboveground rice tissues. Total volatilized 2,4-DBA accounted for 4.74% of its initial mass and was 3.43 times greater than 2,4-DBP. Phytovolatilization of 2,4-DBA and 2,4-DBP contributed to 6.78% and 41.7% of their total volatilization, enhancing the emission of these two contaminants from hydroponic solution into atmosphere. In this study, the interconversion processes between 2,4-DBP and 2,4-DBA were first characterized in rice plants. The demethylation ratio of 2,4-DBA was 12.0%, 32.0 times higher than methylation of 2,4-DBP. Formation of corresponding metabolites through methylation and demethylation processes also contributed to the volatilization of 2,4-DBP and 2,4-DBA from hydroponic solution into the air phase. Methylation and demethylation processes increased phytovolatilization by 12.1% and 36.9% for 2,4-DBP and 2,4-DBA. Results indicate that phytovolatilization and interconversion processes in rice plants serve as important pathways for the global cycles of bromophenols and bromoanisoles.

Indexed as

OryzaBiological TransportPhenolsVolatilization2,4-dibromophenolPhenols2,4-Dibromophenol and 2,4-DibromoanisoleDemethylation processMethylation processPhytovolatilizationRice plants

Identifiers

PMID32593840
PMCPMC7670850
OpenAlexW3037319894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.