Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32593735›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2020

Modeling perception and behavior in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: Support for the predictive processing framework.

Eren Kafadar, Vijay A Mittal, Gregory P Strauss, Hannah C Chapman, Lauren M Ellman, Sonia Bansal, James M Gold, Ben Alderson-Day, Samuel Evans, Jamie Moffatt and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Polygenic risk meets early trauma: toward a neuropsychodevelopmental model of schizophrenia.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Shared and Diverging Neural Dynamics Underlying False and Veridical Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The Future of Perceptual Dysregulation in Psychiatric Nosology.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biomarkers of Auditory-Verbal Hallucinations.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Eren KafadarYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Vijay A MittalNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America.
Gregory P StraussUniversity of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States of America.
Hannah C ChapmanUniversity of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States of America.
Lauren M EllmanTemple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Sonia BansalMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Catonsville, MD, United States of America.
James M GoldMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Catonsville, MD, United States of America.
Ben Alderson-DayDurham University, Durham, UK.
Samuel EvansUniversity of Westminster, London, UK.
Jamie MoffattUniversity of Sussex, Sussex, UK.
Steven M SilversteinUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Elaine F WalkerEmory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Scott W WoodsYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Philip R CorlettYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Albert R PowersYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT, United States of America. Electronic address: albert.powers@yale.edu.
Yale University · USUniversity of Georgia · USDurham University · GBEmory University · USNorthwestern University · USTemple University · USUniversity of Rochester · USUniversity of Sussex · GBUniversity of Westminster · GB

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Cognitive Neurocomputational Task Reliability & Clinical Applications ConsortiumR01MH084828 · NIMH · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI SILVERSTEIN, STEVEN M · 2008 to 2024
$3.3M
5/5 CAPER: Computerized Assessment of Psychosis RiskR01MH120089 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CORLETT, PHILIP, WOODS, SCOTT W · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
1/5 CAPER: Computerized Assessment of ProdromE RiskR01MH120090 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI GOLD, JAMES M. · 2020 to 2024
$2.9M
4/5 CAPER: Computerized assessment of psychosis riskR01MH120092 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI STRAUSS, GREGORY P · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
1/3-Community Psychosis Risk Screening: An Instrument Development Study SupplementR01MH112613 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI ELLMAN, LAUREN M · 2017 to 2022
$1.8M
CAPER: Computerized Assessment of Psychosis Risk SupplementR01MH120091 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI ELLMAN, LAUREN M · 2020 to 2024
$1.6M
Visual Remediation in SchizophreniaR61MH115119 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI KAHN, PAMELA BUTLER, SILVERSTEIN, STEVEN M · 2018 to 2019
$1.5M
A Hearing Test for Hallucinations: Toward Development of Computational Markers for Early DiagnosisK23MH115252 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POWERS, ALBERT R · 2018 to 2022
$983k
Explaining Paranoia: Computational Modeling of Belief Updating in the General PopulationR21MH120799 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CORLETT, PHILIP · 2019 to 2020
$404k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH115252NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084828NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112613NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120089NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120090NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120091NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120092NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH120799NIMH NIH HHS R61 MH115119Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early intervention in psychotic spectrum disorders is critical for maximizing key clinical outcomes. While there is some evidence for the utility of intervention during the prodromal phase of the illness, efficacy of interventions is difficult to assess without appropriate risk stratification. This will require biomarkers that robustly help to identify risk level and are also relatively easy to obtain. Recent work highlights the utility of computer-based behavioral tasks for understanding the pathophysiology of psychotic symptoms. Computational modeling of performance on such tasks may be particularly useful because they explicitly and formally link performance and symptom expression. Several recent studies have successfully applied principles of Bayesian inference to understanding the computational underpinnings of hallucinations. Within this framework, hallucinations are seen as arising from an over-weighting of prior beliefs relative to sensory evidence. This view is supported by recently-published data from two tasks: the Conditioned Hallucinations (CH) task, which determines the degree to which participants use expectations in detecting a target tone; and a Sine-Vocoded Speech (SVS) task, in which participants can use prior exposure to speech samples to inform their understanding of degraded speech stimuli. We administered both of these tasks to two samples of participants at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR; N = 19) and healthy controls (HC; N = 17). CHR participants reported both more conditioned hallucinations and more pre-training SVS detection. In addition, relationships were found between participants' performance on both tasks. On computational modeling of behavior on the CH task, CHR participants demonstrate significantly poorer recognition of task volatility as well as a trend toward higher weighting of priors. A relationship was found between this latter effect and performance on both tasks. Taken together, these results support the assertion that these two tasks may be driven by similar latent factors in perceptual inference, and highlight the potential utility of computationally-based tasks in identifying risk.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersBayes TheoremHallucinationsHumansPerceptionRecognition, PsychologyClinical high risk for psychosisComputational psychiatryPerceptionPredictive codingPsychophysicsPsychosis

Identifiers

PMID32593735
PMCPMC7774587
OpenAlexW3037531000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.