ArticleArtificial intelligence in medicine2020
Regularized-Ncut: Robust and homogeneous functional parcellation of neonate and adult brain networks.
Article in Artificial intelligence in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developmental human brain connectome from fetal stage to early childhood.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- Mapping Functional Brain Organization Using Artificial Intelligence.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- Machine-learning based prediction of future outcome using multimodal MRI during early childhood.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2024Review
- Functional structure of local connections and differentiation of cerebral cortex areas in the neonate.NeuroImage · 2024Article
- Diffusion-tensor-imaging 1-year-old and 2-year-old infant brain atlases with comprehensive gray and white matter labels.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Infant brain regional cerebral blood flow increases supporting emergence of the default-mode network.eLife · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain network parcellation based on resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) is affected by noise, resulting in spurious small patches and decreased functional homogeneity within each network. Obtaining robust and homogeneous parcellation of neonate brain is more difficult, because neonate rs-fMRI is associated with relatively higher level of noise and no prior knowledge from a functional neonate atlas is available as spatial constraints. To meet these challenges, we developed a novel data-driven Regularized Normalized-cut (RNcut) method. RNcut is formulated by adding two regularization terms, a smoothing term using Markov random fields and a small-patch removal term, to conventional normalized-cut (Ncut) method. The RNcut and competing methods were tested with simulated datasets with known ground truth and then applied to both adult and neonate rs-fMRI datasets. Based on the parcellated networks generated by RNcut, intra-network connectivity was quantified. The test results from simulated datasets demonstrated that the RNcut method is more robust (p < 0.01) to noise and can delineate parcellated functional networks with significantly better (p < 0.01) spatial contiguity and significantly higher (p < 0.01) functional homogeneity than competing methods. Application of RNcut to neonate and adult rs-fMRI dataset revealed distinctive functional brain organization of neonate brains from that of adult brains. Collectively, we developed a novel data-driven RNcut method by integrating conventional Ncut with two regularization terms, generating robust and homogeneous functional parcellation without imposing spatial constraints. A broad range of brain network applications and analyses, especially neonate and infant brain parcellation with noisy and large sample of datasets, can potentially benefit from this RNcut method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.