Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32593291›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Mental health of postgraduate trainees in primary care: a cross-sectional study.

Till J Bugaj, Katja Krug, Annalena Rentschler, Christoph Nikendei, Joachim Szecsenyi, Simon Schwill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Till J BugajDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katja KrugDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Marsilius Arkaden, INF 130.3, Turm West, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Annalena RentschlerDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Marsilius Arkaden, INF 130.3, Turm West, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph NikendeiDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Joachim SzecsenyiDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Marsilius Arkaden, INF 130.3, Turm West, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Simon SchwillDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Marsilius Arkaden, INF 130.3, Turm West, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Simon.Schwill@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0954-2194

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral Practitioners (GPs) are increasingly affected by stress-related complaints and burnout. Although many studies have addressed this issue, little is known about the stress burden and burnout rates of postgraduate trainees specialising in General Practice (GP). This cross-sectional study was performed to explore the prevalence and risk of depression, stress and burnout in a large cohort of GP trainees.

methodsAll GP trainees enrolled in the postgraduate training programme KWBW Verbundweiterbildung

resultsN = 211 GP trainees participated in this study (response rate 95%). 75.3% (n = 159) of the participants were female and median age was 34 (IQR 32; 39). GP trainees had a mean PHQ-9 sum score of 5.4 (SD 3.4). Almost 11% (n = 23) reported symptoms of a moderate or moderately severe depression. PSQ-20 revealed moderate level of distress, whereas 20.8% (n = 42) showed a high level of perceived stress with a sum-score higher than .59. GP trainees showed moderate rates of burnout and only 2.5% (n = 5) scored high in all three dimensions of the MBI score. GP trainees showed increased levels of depression, perceived stress and burnout when compared with age-matched general population. Being a woman led to a higher PHQ-9 sum score (p < .05). Higher age was associated with less depersonalisation in the MBI (p < .05).

conclusionsThe results of our study suggest that GP trainees considerably suffer from stress. Some GP trainees were even affected by depression or burnout. To detect and support colleagues at risk, trainees should be supported by early preventive measures such as anti-stress or resilience trainings and mentoring during their training. Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to understand the character and the course of the stress burden among GP trainees.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalDepressionGeneral PracticeOccupational StressAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducationFemaleGeneral PractitionersGermanyHumansMaleMedical Staff, HospitalMental HealthNeeds AssessmentPrevalenceBurnoutDepressionGeneral practiceMental healthPostgraduate educationPrimary careResidencyStressVocational training

Identifiers

PMID32593291
PMCPMC7321542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.