Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32593287›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2020

High-flow nasal cannula improves clinical efficacy of airway management in patients undergoing awake craniotomy.

Ping Yi, Qiong Li, Zhoujing Yang, Li Cao, Xiaobing Hu, Huahua Gu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ping YiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12 Wulumuqi Zhong Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Qiong LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Jiahui International Hospital, Shanghai, 200000, China.
Zhoujing YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12 Wulumuqi Zhong Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Li CaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12 Wulumuqi Zhong Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Xiaobing HuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12 Wulumuqi Zhong Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Huahua GuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12 Wulumuqi Zhong Road, Shanghai, 200040, China. ghhmzk@sina.com.
Fudan University · CNHuashan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAwake craniotomy requires specific sedation procedure in an awake patient who should be able to cooperate during the intraoperative neurological assessment. Currently, limited number of literatures on the application of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in the anesthetic management for awake craniotomy has been reported. Hence, we carried out a prospective study to assess the safety and efficacy of humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) airway management in the patients undergoing awake craniotomy.

methodsSixty-five patients who underwent awake craniotomy were randomly assigned to use HFNC with oxygen flow rate at 40 L/min or 60 L/min, or nasopharynx airway (NPA) device in the anesthetic management. Data regarding airway management, intraoperative blood gas analysis, intracranial pressure, gastric antral volume, and adverse events were collected and analyzed.

resultsPatients using HFNC with oxygen flow rate at 40 or 60 L/min presented less airway obstruction and injuries. Patients with HFNC 60 L/min maintained longer awake time than the patients with NPA. While the intraoperative PaO

conclusionHFNC was safe and effective for the patients during awake craniotomy.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, CHiCTR1800016621 . Date of Registration: 12 June 2018.

Indexed as

AdultAirway ManagementCannulaCraniotomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWakefulnessOxygenAdverse eventsAwake craniotomyGastric antral volumeHigh-flow nasal cannula (HFNC); nasopharyngeal airway (NPA)Intracranial pressure

Identifiers

PMID32593287
PMCPMC7320587
OpenAlexW3037054679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.