Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32592453›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2020

A Maturity Matrix for Nurse Leaders to Facilitate and Benchmark Progress in Genomic Healthcare Policy, Infrastructure, Education, and Delivery.

Emma Tonkin, Kathleen A Calzone, Laurie Badzek, Caroline Benjamin, Anna Middleton, Christine Patch, Maggie Kirk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Nurses' Genomic Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Organizational Support: A Comparative Secondary Analysis of Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey Data.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Global Health and Genomics.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Developing Policy Infrastructure to Guide Genomics-Informed Oncology Nursing in Canada: An Interpretive Descriptive Study.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Canadian Landscape of Genetics and Genomics in Nursing: A Policy Document Analysis.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Roadmap for Global Acceleration of Genomics Integration Across Nursing.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma TonkinAssociate Professor of Genomics Healthcare, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, Rhondda Cynon Taff, Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5759-0927
Kathleen A CalzoneXi, Research Geneticist, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Genetics Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2354-6810
Laurie BadzekAlpha Rho, Nu Omega, Dean and Professor, Penn State College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Caroline BenjaminGenetic Counsellor, Liverpool Women's NHS Hospital Trust, Liverpool, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0021-3650
Anna MiddletonHead of Society and Ethics Research, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus; and Professor, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3103-8098
Christine PatchClinical Lead for Genetic Counselling, Genomics England, London, UK; Principal Staff Scientist, Society and Ethics Research, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire; and Visiting Professor, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4191-0663
Maggie KirkSenior Author, Emeritus Professor of Genetics Education, University of South Wales, Rhondda Cynon Taff, Pontypridd, Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1745-7106

Funding

Genomic Competency InitiativeZIEBC011912 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CALZONE, KATHLEEN · 2019 to 2025
$703k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIE BC011912NCI NIH HHSWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 206194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNurse leaders driving strategic integration of genomics across nursing need tools and resources to evaluate their environment, guide strategies to address deficits, and benchmark progress. We describe the development and pilot testing of a self-assessment maturity matrix (MM) that enables users to benchmark the current state of nursing genomic competency and integration for their country or nursing group; guides the development of a strategic course for improvement and implementation; and assesses change over time.

designMixed-methods participatory research and self-assessment.

methodsDuring a 3-day workshop involving nursing experts in health care and genomics, a genomic integration MM grid was built by consensus using iterative participatory methods. Data were analyzed using descriptive techniques. This work built on an online survey involving the same participants to identify the critical elements needed for "effective nursing which promotes health outcomes globally through genomics."

findingsExperts from 19 countries across six continents and seven organizations participated in item development. The Assessment of Strategic Integration of Genomics across Nursing (ASIGN) MM incorporates 55 outcome-focused items serving as subscales for six critical success factors (CSFs): education and workforce; effective nursing practice; infrastructure and resources; collaboration and communication; public/patient involvement; policy and leadership. Users select their current circumstances for each item against a 5-point ordinal scale (precontemplation to leading). Nurses representing 17 countries undertook matrix pilot testing. Results demonstrate variation across CSFs, with many countries at the earliest stages of implementation.

conclusionsThe MM has the potential to guide the strategic integration of genomics across nursing and enables additional assessments within and between countries to be made. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Nurse leadership and direction are essential to accelerate integration of genomics across nursing practice and education. The MM helps nurse leaders to benchmark progress and guide strategic planning to build global genomic nursing capacity.

Indexed as

GenomicsHealth PolicyBenchmarkingDelivery of Health CareHumansNurse AdministratorsGenomicsmaturity matrixnursingnursing leadershipstrategy

Identifiers

PMID32592453
PMCPMC7721977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.