Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32592447›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2020

Hypothesis-free deep survival learning applied to the tumour microenvironment in gastric cancer.

Armin Meier, Katharina Nekolla, Lindsay C Hewitt, Sophie Earle, Takaki Yoshikawa, Takashi Oshima, Yohei Miyagi, Ralf Huss, Günter Schmidt, Heike I Grabsch

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06642506 (Oncometabolome and MALDI-MSI in Upper GI Carcinomas - Chemosensitivity in Esophageal Carcinoma.), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06642506 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Oncometabolome and MALDI-MSI in Upper GI Carcinomas - Chemosensitivity in Esophageal Carcinoma.

TypeobservationalSponsorLudwig-Maximilians - University of MunichRan2024 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsEsophagus Adenocarcinoma, Esophagus Cancer, Metabolome, Mass Spectrometry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Spatial organization of B lymphocytes and prognosis prediction in patients with gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Digital histopathological images of biopsy predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Armin MeierImage Data Sciences, Definiens GmbH, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6594-8519
Katharina NekollaImage Data Sciences, Definiens GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Lindsay C HewittDepartment of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sophie EarleDivision of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's , University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Takaki YoshikawaDepartment of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi OshimaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Yohei MiyagiMolecular Pathology and Genetics Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama, Japan.
Ralf HussInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostic, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6447-9300
Günter SchmidtImage Data Sciences, Definiens GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Heike I GrabschDepartment of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9520-6228

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological complexity reflected in histology images requires advanced approaches for unbiased prognostication. Machine learning and particularly deep learning methods are increasingly applied in the field of digital pathology. In this study, we propose new ways to predict risk for cancer-specific death from digital images of immunohistochemically (IHC) stained tissue microarrays (TMAs). Specifically, we evaluated a cohort of 248 gastric cancer patients using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in an end-to-end weakly supervised scheme independent of subjective pathologist input. To account for the time-to-event characteristic of the outcome data, we developed new survival models to guide the network training. In addition to the standard H&E staining, we investigated the prognostic value of a panel of immune cell markers (CD8, CD20, CD68) and a proliferation marker (Ki67). Our CNN-derived risk scores provided additional prognostic value when compared to the gold standard prognostic tool TNM stage. The CNN-derived risk scores were also shown to be superior when systematically compared to cell density measurements or a CNN score derived from binary 5-year survival classification, which ignores time-to-event. To better understand the underlying biological mechanisms, we qualitatively investigated risk heat maps for each marker which visualised the network output. We identified patterns of biological interest that were related to low risk of cancer-specific death such as the presence of B-cell predominated clusters and Ki67 positive sub-regions and showed that the corresponding risk scores had prognostic value in multivariate Cox regression analyses (Ki67&CD20 risks: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15-1.89, p = 0.002; CD20&CD68 risks: HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.07-1.67, p = 0.009). Our study demonstrates the potential additional value that deep learning in combination with a panel of IHC markers can bring to the field of precision oncology.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImmunohistochemistryTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, CDAntigens, CD20Antigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticBiomarkers, TumorCD68 MoleculeCD8 AntigensCell ProliferationHumansKi-67 AntigenNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentAntigens, CDAntigens, CD20Antigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticBiomarkers, TumorCD68 antigen, humanCD68 MoleculeCD8 AntigensKi-67 AntigenMKI67 protein, humancomputational pathologydeep learninggastric cancerKi67survival analysistumour infiltrating immune cells

Identifiers

PMID32592447
PMCPMC7578283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.