ArticleJournal of neurology2020
High diagnostic value of plasma Niemann-Pick type C biomarkers in adults with selected neurological and/or psychiatric disorders.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sertraline Treatment Can Mimic Niemann-Pick Type C Biomarker Profile: A Diagnostic Pitfall.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Biomarker Validation in NPC1: Foundations for Clinical Trials and Regulatory Alignment.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Review
- Advances in mass spectrometry of lipids for the investigation of Niemann-pick type C disease.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the landscape of pharmacodynamic biomarkers in Niemann-Pick Disease Type C (NPC).Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Review
- Psychiatric burden in a cohort of adults with Niemann Pick type C disease: from psychotic symptoms to frontal lobe behavioral disorders.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Advancing Diagnosis and Treatment of Niemann-Pick C disease through Biomarker Discovery.Exploration of neuroprotective therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Late-onset Niemann-Pick type C (NP-C) is a rare, underdiagnosed lysosomal disease with neurological manifestations. A specific treatment, miglustat, can stabilize the disease if given early. Recently, three plasma screening biomarkers (PSBs) were developed [cholestane3β,5α,6βtriol (C-triol), 7-ketocholesterol (7-KC), and lysosphingomyelin-509 (LSM-509)], allowing a simpler and quite robust screening of patients suitable for genetic testing. The objective of our study was to evaluate practical utility and feasibility of large-scale PSB screening for NP-C in selected adult patients. Patients were prospectively enrolled if they showed, starting from 12 years of age, at least one of the three initial neuro-psychiatric manifestations described in NP-C: (1) gait disorder (cerebellar and/or dystonic); (2) cognitive decline with frontal lobe syndrome; (3) atypical psychosis. PSBs were measured in plasma of all patients and, if positive (LSM-509 and/or C-triol + 7-KC elevated), sequencing of NPC1 and NPC2 genes was performed. A total of 251 patients [136 males, 115 females; median age 42.1 (range 12.2-85.6) years] were screened. Six patients had positive PSBs. Two were confirmed to have NP-C (0.8% diagnostic yield, both with all three PSBs highly increased, especially LSM-509). False-positive rate was 1.2%, which was identical if only considering LSM-509. By contrast, false-positive rates were 8.1% and 5.7% for 7-KC and C-triol, respectively. We showed that selecting patients with neurologic and/or psychiatric symptoms consistent with NP-C for large-scale PSB screening is a simple and valid strategy to identify new adult NP-C patients, and would probably lead to earlier diagnosis and treatment administration if widely applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32592146What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.